Cyclones Rock
Registered User
- Jun 12, 2008
- 10,484
- 6,370
It was a statement about how he was playing at that time. We were debating how he was playing at that time. How that statement "ages" doesn't change later regardless of whether he wins the Conn Smythe or gets thrown out of professional hockey at some later date.
It's like you quoted a news report from last summer describing things being shut down in a heat wave, and said "this hasn't aged very well". Disingenuous.
Me rn:
That would imply that for the first 5 or 6 games he wasn't playing like the "same old Wennberg", which is precisely what the debate was about (the quote is from a month ago). I said he was playing differently, CR said he was playing the same. Thank you for taking my side of things.
You amaze me. "Quoted from last summer". No. About a month ago after you flip flopped on a bum based on a dead cat bounce.
Your opinionws jump around more than a kangaroo. "But I said that last week. That doesn't matter". Changing one's opinions based on play for a few games rather than holding an opinion based on two plus years isn't indicative of having very sound reasoning.
Good analysis on Dougie Hamilton, btw. Or has that changed?
Carry on.
Last edited: