This is my gripe with this whole character thing and the Bruins so-called great leadership. Not saying our leaders aren't leaders, because I think they are. But you'd think management could take a risk with some players, hoping that our leaders could help turn them around, instead of taking lesser players because they think they have better character.
You can't teach skill. We had the vets. Kids grow up.
I always laugh at stuff like this. Like, if VAN had Pasta, they would have been in a position to take Pettersson. One change in a draft and entire seasons can change, leading to a domino effect. The ol' butterfly flaps it's wings at the draft table effect.There was a thread on the main boards titled
"Which Team Would Have Benefitted the Most From Taking the Player that Went 1 Pick Later?"
I was curious on who went right before our top line guys. Not saying we were going pick these guys but we were that close to losing out on our stud line.
2003 - LA Kings take Konstantin Pushkaryov at 44 instead of Patrice Bergeron in the 2nd round. Konstantin played in 17 games NHL games and put up 5 points. Imagine the Kings with Kopitar and Bergeron down the middle, could have more cups. The walking alphabet played in the minors but mostly in the KHL where he never got more then 17 pts in a season.
2006 - Islanders take as the 70th pick in the 3rd round Robin Figren and the next pick is Brad Marchand. Figren never made it out of the AHL and is playing in Sweden. Where his season career high was 31 pts. Maybe Tavares stays with the Isles if he has Marshy on his wing and Bailey. Or Marchand, Barzal, Bailey as a line right now.
2014 - Vancouver takes at #24 Jared McCann , Bruins grab Pasta at 25. McCann is still young and can turn out decent with 23 goals in 188 NHL games to date. Imagine Pasta and Pettersson together.
I had heard that one of the reasons they didn't pick him was how he performed in the team interview. This from Friedman wouldn't shock me at all if true.Elliot friedman said on his podcast that the Bruins were turned off by Barzal's answer when they asked why they should pick him. He said something along the lines of "don't, and we'll see how it works out for you".
Absolutely. Like I mentioned above, these are teenage boys and they have a roster full of vets that are good role models. I want to draft a kid with confidence, not one that will second guess themselves their whole development. To think that could have been the reason we don't have a talent like Barzal right now, but instead somebody that may never have an NHL career is frustrating as all hell.
Of course, we dont really know if a) Barzal actually said that and b) if he did, how much it actually played into the Bruins' decision.
For what it is worth, I saw a video on Youtube where a crew followed Barzal around, including into Seidenberg's house where he lived during his rookie year. Seemed like a nice, grounded kid who meshed with the Seidenberg family well.
Off topic, but I really think things would have gone so much better with Seguin here had he lived with a family his first few years.
I mean outside of two gift draft picks, you've managed to produce 4 players in a 6 year time frame. I mean the best you've been able to produce outside of Seguin/Hamilton over a 6 year span is a undersized 2nd/3rd pairing d-man, a 45 points winger who doesn't know how to spell defense and a pair of back-up goalies.
That's why people in the entire hockey world where kind of "wtf" with the Bruins picks in 2015, they had two player gifted to them and they pass on both 3 times in a row. Kinda like if the Bruins picked Nino Niederreitter in 2010 and Nathan Beaulieu in 2011. Yeah those guys would have been NHLers, Nino a pretty good one, but passing on those gift (Seguin-Hamilton) would have been a 2015 like moment and imho, an error.
Not this again ...
Kluzak had major knee surgery on one if not both knees prior to being drafted by the Bruins that summer. I was bummed out about that since we were just about to lose Brad Park and several years prior lost Bobby Orr to knee injuries. I remember reading about Kluzaks knee problems in "The Hockey News" magazine and praying that they would pass on him.It's easy to point after the fact when you know what guys actually became impact players. But to call the draft an inexact science is selling it way too low.
In terms of this topic though, one of the worst was Kluzak over Brian Bellows. Even if you wanted to take a dman there, you had Scott Stevens and Phil Housley to pick from as well. Obviously injuries curtailed Gord's career, but man, Bellows would have been sweet.
Elliot friedman said on his podcast that the Bruins were turned off by Barzal's answer when they asked why they should pick him. He said something along the lines of "don't, and we'll see how it works out for you".
That's why people in the entire hockey world where kind of "wtf" with the Bruins picks in 2015, they had two player gifted to them and they pass on both 3 times in a row. Kinda like if the Bruins picked Nino Niederreitter in 2010 and Nathan Beaulieu in 2011. Yeah those guys would have been NHLers, Nino a pretty good one, but passing on those gift (Seguin-Hamilton) would have been a 2015 like moment and imho, an error.
Just a terrible job at trying to troll the 2015 draft. How many teams passed on Barzal, Chabot? I'll never understand how Boston takes so much flak for not draft Barzal, but there were a lot of other teams that passed on him too....but it only matters that Boston passed on him. Honestly I don't understand why no one calls out the teams that pass on Rantanen
Commenting on what others teams did in the first round of that draft is merely "whataboutism" (What About 'Whataboutism'?) that is used to deflect from the focus of the conversation, which is what you are doing. Who cares what the other teams did? We're here to talk about the Bruins and the team's drafting. In 2015, Boston was in a unique position, with three picks in a row in a prime spot in a deep draft, and deliberately passed on the two best players considered to be still available, namely, Barzal and Connor.
Just a terrible job at trying to troll the 2015 draft. How many teams passed on Barzal, Chabot? I'll never understand how Boston takes so much flak for not draft Barzal, but there were a lot of other teams that passed on him too....but it only matters that Boston passed on him. Honestly I don't understand why no one calls out the teams that pass on Rantanen
I don't care what you say. The 2015 draft has been a big piece to why our future is so great in its entirety. Very good draft for us
Zboril - Solid LHD of the future. Adds on to the depth
Debrusk - Phenomenally skilled all around player with a great shot and the heart of a lion
Senyshyn - This dude makes me want to blow my brains out and I have no hope for him. One bad, big deal
Carlo - Our shutdown dman of the future. Matthews, Nylander, Marner, Tavares, Eichel, Skinner, Kucherov, Stamkos, Point: Meet Brandon Carlo. He'll be owning your ass once he reaches his peak. Also still has some solid offensive upside to at least become a potential 30 point dman.
Lauzon - LHD who has played great in his short time in the big leagues. Looks like he and Vaak are the future on the left with Zboril.
JFK - Good 3rd line center of the future . . . and present. If he bypasses all expectations then he can be a good 2C for us.
People can moan and groan about Chabot and Barzal and Connor, but every team makes draft mistakes. 25 teams missed on Pastrnak and he's at least the 3rd best player in that draft and I'm going on a limb and saying he was the best.
Mac also a top 5 player at least in the 2016 draft. Future cornerstone dman.
So any Isles fans. News flash. You took ****ing Dal Colle over Pastrnak.
Its pretty simple. The Bruins just didn't pass on him once ,not twice but three times.
Just a terrible job at trying to troll the 2015 draft. How many teams passed on Barzal, Chabot? I'll never understand how Boston takes so much flak for not draft Barzal, but there were a lot of other teams that passed on him too....but it only matters that Boston passed on him. Honestly I don't understand why no one calls out the teams that pass on Rantanen
Sickest part of not drafting Barzal was not trading down if your intention was to pass on him. So so gross.
Wesley wasn't a bad pick.How about the Bruins missing not once but twice on Joe Sakic? Think of the missed cups.