Crosbyfan
Registered User
- Nov 27, 2003
- 12,671
- 2,493
Eaton-Sid-Iggy
Vokoun-Geno-Neal
Dupuis-Sutter-Reirden
Despres-Vitale-Niskanen
How did I do?
Sorry, Kunitz TK, Dupers still has you beat
Eaton-Sid-Iggy
Vokoun-Geno-Neal
Dupuis-Sutter-Reirden
Despres-Vitale-Niskanen
How did I do?
Jacques G said:Don't go to sleep yet, you're all in for a big surprise...
Right, but for Iggy's first?!? Why?!
- HFBoards, for not recognizing that Bylsma's trying to get malkin and sutters line chemistry with the new acquisitions. Its not that he thinks kennedy is great.
I don't speak for everyone but for me I understand this, but why Kennedy. Jeffery or even Vitale would be better IMO. I know the arguments for Kennedy but to me the guys a waste, needs to be on the 4th line all the time now.
Jeffery maaaybe. Vitale c'mon. Yeah I know everyones got a big hard on for him, and I agree he should be in over glass, but centering the first line?
Jeffery is much slower than kennedy, not just straight line but just everything. Regardless does it really matter that much? Jeffery/Kennedy they both suck... kennedy has shining moments in the past, Jeffery has just pretty much always sucked. It doesn't really matter, hell it was the first game maybe they'll switch it up.
He needs to keep the play in front of him. Once he starts going side to side he's dead... but I guess you can say that about half the goalies in the league. The Pens spent most of the game chasing last night so its hard to blame the goalies. Just a bad effort by everyone but MAF and maybe Glass.Disgusting game by Vokoun. He is so slow its not even funny anymore.
He needs to keep the play in front of him. Once he starts going side to side he's dead... but I guess you can say that about half the goalies in the league. The Pens spent most of the game chasing last night so its hard to blame the goalies. Just a bad effort by everyone but MAF and maybe Glass.
Meh, we were bound to lose sometime. Maybe now we can get back into playoff mode.
For the record, people do realize that this streak is tied for the 2nd longest in NHL history, right?
Meh, we were bound to lose sometime. Maybe now we can get back into playoff mode.
For the record, people do realize that this streak is tied for the 2nd longest in NHL history, right?
Meh, we were bound to lose sometime. Maybe now we can get back into playoff mode.
For the record, people do realize that this streak is tied for the 2nd longest in NHL history, right?
Meh, we were bound to lose sometime. Maybe now we can get back into playoff mode.
For the record, people do realize that this streak is tied for the 2nd longest in NHL history, right?
Meh, we were bound to lose sometime. Maybe now we can get back into playoff mode.
For the record, people do realize that this streak is tied for the 2nd longest in NHL history, right?
I just really dislike Kennedy ha ha. Plus those guys are centers where Kennedy hasnt played it for years. And with any of the 3 we're discussing at center I wouldn't call it Line 1 but I get the jist. Ya it was only the first game, guess we'll see how it goes tonight.
I saw after the game TV said something like "It's hard to play with that level of emotion every game." I'm sure some people won't like it but I'm also sure it's true. There's going to be a clunker every now and then when they come out flat and unemotional & don't play well. As long as it doesn't happen during the playoffs, which I seriously doubt it would, I can just chalk it up to **** happens. Even if they're playing an 8 seed I think they'll be really invested in the playoffs. Particularly if it ends with the Isles or Rangers in 8. Division opponent in the first round would add a little extra incentive.
No doubt.
Not to dwell on streaks, I always thought it was interesting that the 70's Habs and 80's Oilers never had untouchable winning streaks. The 1982 Isles (which we're tied with now) are sort of an exception to that, but a lot of the streaks record holders are held by some above average, yet incredibly flawed teams (2001 Devils, 1985 Flyers, 1993 Penguins).
There's a few championship teams on the streaks list (1971 Bruins, 82 Isles, etc.), though, so make of it what you will.
I think people read too far into streaks to begin with. Granted, you have to be a damn good team to win 15 in a row. That many wins isn't an accident. Still, it doesn't make them unbeatable any more than a loss makes them suddenly stink. It just is what it is. It's a nice little historical footnote and it would have been cool if they had set the NHL record, but they didn't and ultimately that means absolutely nothing.