breaking up the best line in hockey to try bennett and iggy? IDK. I can see iggy. BB....Meh come playoffs. As mind boggling as it is, sid looks best when duper is there with him.
I like the lines as they are but if i tried any change it would be:
Dupes Crosby Kunitz
BB Malkin Neal
Morrow Sutter Iggy
Cooke Vitale Kennedy
I know putting iggy on the 3rd line would be sacrilege. But, he and neal are both shooters, even if different kinds. I like leaving them together because it could make for an unstoppable force, and an angry playoff Geno with an amped up Iginla could be so sweet to see.
However, I think BB plays at a good speed for Malkin and Neal and has shown strong IQ to fit in and play well. If he can allow Geno and Neal to produce per usual, our first line is already studly, and i would make the bold claim that a 3rd of Morrow Sutter Iggy is better than Staal's old trio.
Talk about a matchup nightmare.
Add in that 4th line which would be fast, chippy, and similarly productive to a 3rd line and i like it even more.
Just my $.02
As for last nights game it was a stinker. Murray was the only guy i really loved. I want him resigned badly. Would also liked to have seen someone drop the gloves when down 3-1 to give the team a spark and keep the streak alive.
Also. DESPRES HIT WAS CLEAN. Guy touches puck and got rocked by a clean shoulder through chest hit. Despres did not finish him with arms up for extra force, and hit a player in a known high traffic area. Sometimes in hockey guys get nailed. Its not always a penalty because it looks painful. SIMON IS A TRUCK
Sorry to keep going but i am now thinking a D with Despres, Murray, Orpick, and Engo/Bortuzzo would be fearsome. If without Brooks, i like Bortuzzo to be a bottom pairing guy next year, save the cap space on brooks.
Martin, Letang, Nisky, Murray, Engo, Eaton, Borts. Good balance of fast, smart, physical and pure punishment.