Hynh
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2012
- 6,170
- 5,345
So if the Oilers moved back to 16 they could expect a player to arrive earlier than the same player drafted at 14 because of Chychrun, Barzal, Zadorov and Wilson? Also, Morrisey didn't go 14th, McAvoy made the NHL in his D+2 and Shattenkirk made it in his D+4\If Askarov is 5-7 years out is that significant compared to the level of forward at d typically available at 14? Heck, if Pulju makes it this season it’ll be his draft +4, and he was (nearly) a consensus top 3.
Here’s the players picked at 14 dating back to ‘05 and how many years it took them to make the bigs (I used 50 games as “making it”—subjective, I know):
2005 Pokulok - bust
2006 Grabner -4 years
2007 Shattenkirk - 5 years
2008 Boychuk - bust
2009 Kulikov - draft year
2010 Schwartz -4 years
2011 Oleksiak - 7 years
2012 Girgensens - 2 years
2013 Morrisey - 4 years
2014 Honka - hasn’t made it in 6 years
2015 DeBrusk - 3 years
2016 McAvoy - 3 years
2017 Foote - hasn’t made it in first 3 post-draft seasons
2018 Farabee - 2 years
More players than not took >/= 4 years to make bigs. If Oilers draft Askarov and he takes 5 is that really a big deal?
For comparison, here’s the tendies drafted top 15 since ‘05:
2019 Knight (14th) it’s early
2012 Vasilevskiy (*19th)- 5 years
2010 Campbell (11th) - 9 years
2006 Bernier (11th) - 8 years
2005 Price (5th) - 3 years
So there is risk Askarov (should he make it) takes >5 years, but 3/5 goalies listed above are premier to franchise level talents and the early returns on Knight are promising. Both Vasilevskiy and Price would go first OA in redrafts. When a team could nab a top 5 equivalent, franchise-altering tender at 14th OA—gotta be hard to pass.
Probably moot.
Also, Vasilevskiy only has a chance to go first in 2012 because 2012 was f***ing awful. He doesn't stand a chance in any other draft since 2004
Last edited: