Bournival started playing with plekanec too and had a great start before getting hurt. I think something like 12 of his 14 points last year were with plekanec and gionta.
The Jiri Sekac Thread
- Thread starter XxCanadiensxX
- Start date
Bournival started playing with plekanec too and had a great start before getting hurt. I think something like 12 of his 14 points last year were with plekanec and gionta.
CN_paladin
Registered User
We need a PPG forward like Kane, Stamkos, etc.
That's why we aren't a top tier team due to lack of offense.
JohnLennon
Registered User
- Mar 26, 2011
- 5,787
- 1,558
I don't agree with that. Teams without a superstar PPG forward can still win the cup. I think forward depth is much more important.
Seks is great!!
Seks and scoring go hand in hand.
I hate Saturday nights without Habs hockey. No Seks tonight.
Seks and scoring go hand in hand.
I hate Saturday nights without Habs hockey. No Seks tonight.
Richiebottles
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Jul 26, 2010
- 16,330
- 1,163
Stjonnypopo
Rgesitreed Uesr
I see the comparison. It would be awesome if Sekac could be as good as Eriksson was in his prime (before being traded to Boston and ******** the bed).
I think Sekac is faster and brings more energy though. He's exactly the type of player Plekanec needed.
Bournival got Therrien'd. Unfortunately couldn't recover:
Gets icetime completely taken out after a couple games.
Seks is great!!
Seks and scoring go hand in hand.
I hate Saturday nights without Habs hockey. No Seks tonight.
I feel like you're trying to say something.
Bournival got Therrien'd. Unfortunately couldn't recover:
Gets icetime completely taken out after a couple games.
kind of sucks but, we have better options now anyways.
Fazkovsky
Registered User
- Sep 4, 2013
- 7,248
- 1,309
Redux91
I do Three bullets.
groovejuice
Without deviation progress is not possible
Cole Caulifield
Registered User
- Apr 22, 2004
- 27,967
- 2,465
Exactly. If we had Stamkos we'd be a powerhouse. Ovechkin would work as well. A superstar forward with superstar offensive skills who can make things happen on the PP is what we need.
Smokey Thompson
Registered User
I disagree. We need a franchise centre who plays a complete game. Doesn't need to be a 50 goal scorer or a 100 pt player. If said player can get us 70-80 points while being a very responsible two-way #1 centre who is used in all situations, he'd be of more value to us than Stamkos or Ovechkin.
Hopefully Galchenyuk can be that player.
Stamkos makes all the difference between the Lightning and the Habs. Take him away and TB probably wouldn't make the playoffs. Add Ovechkin to the Habs and they easily win the division with the centers they already have.
PernellsWhiteAmi
Long Live Chappelle
So then what are we trading to get Ovechkin, picks? Not that we'd ever trade for Ovechkin, but what makes you think we'd be able to keep Eller, Plekanec, and Galchenyuk, who happen to be three of our more valuable players, if we were getting Ovechkin?
Yes, you are right that the Habs would be much better with Ovechkin or Stamkos, but so would every other team in the National Hockey League. There's a reason these players are highly coveted. They don't grow off trees.
Lebowski
El Duderino
- Dec 5, 2010
- 17,585
- 5,218
groovejuice
Without deviation progress is not possible
Yes they did. Won one cup in 40 years. One other recent final loss. That's barely better than the Leafs.
Now they're back on the decline.
Good riddance I say. Good riddance.
Lebowski
El Duderino
- Dec 5, 2010
- 17,585
- 5,218
