Perception vs reality is a real thing in sports and business, and when you make a move that makes you look weak, in this case firing a GM without a suitable replacement, other savvy GMs will take advantage. It weakens the position of the franchise.
Those are fair points at the end, but for me it's not enough to tip the scales. I strongly believe that bringing in a new GM and saddling them with cap baggage and "assets" like Jones and Vlasic is setting them up for failure. I'd rather let DW fill in the hole first before moving on to someone else
It's a risky decision either way and I am glad I don't have to make it.
I think you exaggerate the effects here. Most new GM's don't get taken advantage of. Front offices don't materially affect the position of the franchise in this manner. This type of move doesn't make the team look weak to the fans nor does it to investors or other teams. Plenty of teams hire first time GM's where it doesn't even register on anyone's radar.
As for the next GM's being saddled, that's the business and the spot he chose to accept a job from. Most people in these circles looking for a GM spot know what they're dealing with when they look to manage them. I'm confident that the owner and the candidate have this sort of conversation when they're interviewing. Why are we treating them like naïve children? They're not. Most are comparably bright to DW. Some are dumb sure but you expect them to weed them out and hold them accountable when they don't.