Why not NateDog?My yellow lab pup is gonna be named Mikko when I pick him up in 2 weeks!
Get a female dog, then call it Long Bitch Native.Why not NateDog?
It's a shame about his foot coordination lolRantanen has some of the best hand eye coordination I’ve ever seen in the NHL to be honest.
It's a shame about his foot coordination lol
He’s taken som heat in the playoffs, but shout out to the Moose for making a couple huge plays to force game 7.
Not many guys in the league have the hands to laser a puck out of the air like this.
Hard to see on this video, but he had an awesome touch pass to Cale on his goal. So quick you can barely see it.
What do you guys think Rantanens ceiling is right now? Like at times he seems so dominant other nights hes kinda invisible for stretches.
I am 100% on the rosy glasses with mikko too thats why I was asking. I feel the rest of the league still underrating him substantially. Especially with a center like Nate 100 points seems possible for years and he's just entering his prime.If he can stay healthy he should be a 100-point player, especially if he's stapled to Nathan MacKinnon's wing the whole time. But he has to stay healthy.
The good news is that even on nights where you could swear he stinks up the joint, he still somehow manages to find his way onto the score sheet.
I know I'm being super-rosy with my projections. 100 points is very hard to achieve in the NHL. But I think he can do it or come close while he's in his prime. That said, Marian Hossa, whose style is very similar to Mikko's only hit 100 points once IIRC.
After last year's playoffs I was convinced I was going to name my first born Mikko. Having second thoughts now though.My yellow lab pup is gonna be named Mikko when I pick him up in 2 weeks!
Mikko is a very good name for a dog.
Mikko The Sherman. I like.After last year's playoffs I was convinced I was going to name my first born Mikko. Having second thoughts now though.
I agree with this. I think when Mikko plays with Nate, a lot of the time he starts to defer instead of driving the play. They should at least try to let him be the top dog in his own line. It's not like Nate totally needs Mikko at this point either, he was putting up points while centering Calvert and Nieto at one point.The big thing I want to see from Rantanen, is for him to start asserting himself more frequently. There's games where you just seem him take over and he makes some of the most ridiculous passes to set up his teammates for tap ins. There are other games where he's slow to the puck, and just floating waiting for MacKinnon to make a play.
While I love MacK and Rantanen together, I still think it may be the best for the organization to split them up and have Rantanen be the top dog on his line. That still gives them the option to put the 9296 line back together when the team is down.
The big thing I want to see from Rantanen, is for him to start asserting himself more frequently. There's games where you just seem him take over and he makes some of the most ridiculous passes to set up his teammates for tap ins. There are other games where he's slow to the puck, and just floating waiting for MacKinnon to make a play.
While I love MacK and Rantanen together, I still think it may be the best for the organization to split them up and have Rantanen be the top dog on his line. That still gives them the option to put the 9296 line back together when the team is down.
Agreed. Avs were firing on all cylinders when Rantanen was carrying his own line in the 2019 playoffs. Signing Taylor Hall would be perfect for implementing a legit 2 top line approach.
Hall - MacKinnon - Burakovsky
Landeskog - Kadri - Rantanen
Hall likes to drive the puck on his own line
MacK will sit him down and tell him to do what he's told.
It’s more an issue of skillset. Hall is like a better version of Burakovsky in that he carries the puck and generates his offense himself. Playing him and Mack together would reduce the efficacy of both