Steve55
Registered User
I would draw your attention to the arguments set forth by defendants in their January 22, 2020 letter to the court: https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fb...cumentId=M62y4CRpLnhZyD21u0wm9g==&system=prod
1) ESD doesn't contest that it received a plan from NYRA expressly contemplating a NYI arena. But NYRA didn't conduct the RFP process - indeed, it was barred from conducting it by statute. ESD conducted the process.
2) The Village wasn't a bidder. It doesn't have standing to challenge the award of a contract by a public authority.
3) There is no statutory or common law precedent that renders communications between communications between a potential developer or third party non-developer, and a state agency about a development proposal before an RFP process begins improper, much less sufficient to render the process unlawful.
When you take a look at documentary evidence submitted in a case, as the LIBN article does, you need to keep in mind that the evidence may be intriguing, but irrelevant in the context of the matter.
Thanks for the link