Good to know...The only big things that bothered me is how they handled Jon's ending. Like really what's he doing up north? What is he doing during his raids behind the wall. Doesn't make too much sense. Greyworm left so, why is he banished and the person who convinced him is hand to the king while his brother is KING.
Yeah, no matter how many prequels we get I'll be watching.
and good to know... I just can't seem to get back into hockey. NO idea why.
It turns out that I (among others) interpreted Jon's ending in the same way Kit Harrington did. Jon is finally "free". Yeah, he's sent to Castle Black, but, unbeknownst to Greyworm, he was just being sent back to the people (the Free Folk) that he was always told he belonged with...and Ghost. In terms of character endings, the idea that Jon, who truly "didn't want" (LOL) any of the power or that other bureaucratic BS, gets to live out his life in the exact manner he always wanted...in that way, he kind of got the best ending in terms of pure happiness.
Now, was it handled the best way? Again, no, not necessarily, and I'd lay that blame at D&D's feet. It does call in to question "well why was Jon brought back?" and all of that, and my answer tends to be "Well...the Lord of Light brought him back because he was always going to be the only one who would be able to kill Dany once she submitted to the Targaryen 'Madness'." Is it a perfect explanation? Nah, I don't think so, but in terms of what we saw it's at least somewhat plausible.