I've watched a little.Anyone here watch How to Get Away with Murder?
Anyone here watch How to Get Away with Murder?
I've watched a little.
Two things:
First: I realize that shows are fake, but the producers have literally no understanding of the way that the law or law school works.
Second: The nonstop flash forwards are super annoying, but the story is somewhat entertaining. Some people might really like it, it's just okay to me.
Yea, aware that the actual legal work is secondary to the show, it's just incredibly annoying that whoever produced it has apparently never been to or known anyone in law school.Yeah, I'm more interested in the stories than the actual law work. The show runners aren't convincing anyone of the law work on screen that they show as being legit.
I'm not usually into shows like this, though. I'd prefer to watch endless re-runs of Entourage, but eventually I have to start something new.
Fel d 1 would be the answer to that. Stupid cat proteins.
Nadal vs Federer this Sunday, if only it wasn't 3:30 in the morning. Probably the last time to see those two go at it in a final.
Nadal vs Federer this Sunday, if only it wasn't 3:30 in the morning. Probably the last time to see those two go at it in a final.
I'm seriously excited for this. I don't watch tennis anymore but I grew up watching Nadal and Federer play. Was a big fan of Federer and want him to win this one.
Same, amazing that he's playing for yet another championship at his age, Nadal too but lesser so. When I first started watching tennis I was a Nadal fan and was kind of anti-Federer, just refusing to like the #1 like everyone else ya know. But that changed quick, just his style of play and being a complete gentleman off the court won me over.
Both are classy guys and can't really see a loser in this no matter who wins, but I'd be lying if I wasn't pulling hard for Feds. Plus we share the same birthday.
It actually kills me that I won't be able to watch the game.. No way I'll be able to stay up that late, and no way the results don't get spoiled if I were to wait until the next night.
I think it's more impressive that Nadal is playing for a championship than it is Federer given Nadal's body is almost completely destroyed
I think we had this debate before, but Nadal is nothing more than a athletic beast for me. Depending on any sport, I dislike players who all they have to go to the gym and they're good at any sport no matter what. For me, I appreciate technique skills at a particular sport than athleticism, so Datsyuk over Lindrois for example.Same, amazing that he's playing for yet another championship at his age, Nadal too but lesser so. When I first started watching tennis I was a Nadal fan and was kind of anti-Federer, just refusing to like the #1 like everyone else ya know. But that changed quick, just his style of play and being a complete gentleman off the court won me over.
Both are classy guys and can't really see a loser in this no matter who wins, but I'd be lying if I wasn't pulling hard for Feds. Plus we share the same birthday.
It actually kills me that I won't be able to watch the game.. No way I'll be able to stay up that late, and no way the results don't get spoiled if I were to wait until the next night.
I think we had this debate before, but Nadal is nothing more than a athletic beast for me. Depending on any sport, I dislike players who all they have to go to the gym and they're good at any sport no matter what. For me, I appreciate technique skills at a particular sport than athleticism, so Datsyuk over Lindrois for example.
That isn't to say that Nadal doesn't have technical skill, he has a great deal of it to be ranked in top 5 for his prime, but to say he's better than Murray (who I dislike), Djokovic, Wawrinka, or Nishikori something I don't buy from anyone.
As for my favourite player, Wawrinka, he has ran into some problems lately. Lost in the Round of 32 in Paris. Lost in the group stage in ATP (granted it was against Murray). Lost to Nishikori in the semi-finals in Brisbane. Lost to freakin' Federer in the semi-finals at the Australia Open. So he's not having a good run, but in the mean time I've been watching a lot of Nishikori and Kyrgios since both are quite entertaining (especially Kyrgios ).
Haven't watched a lot of Raonic, but heard good things about him. He's probably a big star in Canada.
I think we had this debate before, but Nadal is nothing more than a athletic beast for me. Depending on any sport, I dislike players who all they have to go to the gym and they're good at any sport no matter what. For me, I appreciate technique skills at a particular sport than athleticism, so Datsyuk over Lindrois for example.
That isn't to say that Nadal doesn't have technical skill, he has a great deal of it to be ranked in top 5 for his prime, but to say he's better than Murray (who I dislike), Djokovic, Wawrinka, or Nishikori something I don't buy from anyone.
As for my favourite player, Wawrinka, he has ran into some problems lately. Lost in the Round of 32 in Paris. Lost in the group stage in ATP (granted it was against Murray). Lost to Nishikori in the semi-finals in Brisbane. Lost to freakin' Federer in the semi-finals at the Australia Open. So he's not having a good run, but in the mean time I've been watching a lot of Nishikori and Kyrgios since both are quite entertaining (especially Kyrgios ).
Haven't watched a lot of Raonic, but heard good things about him. He's probably a big star in Canada.
The older I get, the more I need it.The older I get, the more I love whiskey.