Here's the updated GF/GA/xGF% for D-Pairs:
At Evens:
All Strengths:
It's so weird to me that Sully hasn't tried Tanev much with Crosby, what has been the actual minutes of those two together and their ice time?According to Sabres fans he's much better on the wing. He can play centre if really needed, but you probably don't want him there. Besides, McCann is a much better 3C than Rod.
Assuming Jake is still injured come playoff time:
Zucker - Sid - Tanev
Marleau - Geno - Rust
Sheary - McCann - Hornqvist
Simon/Rod - Blueger - Lafferty
It's so weird to me that Sully hasn't tried Tanev much with Crosby, what has been the actual minutes of those two together and their ice time?
Or Pets-Marino and ride the hell out of your top two pairs so you only have to shelter one pair? Reminds me of Nashville the year we played them in the cup, their third pairing was averaging 12-15 a night during the playoffs.Those on-ice results tell me the D pairs should be:
Dumoulin-Letang
JJ-Marino
Pettersson-Schultz
But the problem is that neither JJ or Schultz should be in the Penguins top-4. Maybe ride the hell out of the 1st pair and treat the 2nd and 3rd pairs as equal pairs, but not true 2nd pairs?
Those on-ice results tell me the D pairs should be:
Dumoulin-Letang
JJ-Marino
Pettersson-Schultz
But the problem is that neither JJ or Schultz should be in the Penguins top-4. Maybe ride the hell out of the 1st pair and treat the 2nd and 3rd pairs as equal pairs, but not true 2nd pairs?
What did Riikola do to you, are you Mike Sullivan?Those on-ice results tell me the D pairs should be:
Dumoulin-Letang
JJ-Marino
Pettersson-Schultz
But the problem is that neither JJ or Schultz should be in the Penguins top-4. Maybe ride the hell out of the 1st pair and treat the 2nd and 3rd pairs as equal pairs, but not true 2nd pairs?
To me, those D pairs and these forward lines should be the plan for now is:
1. Sheary with Crosby and Zucker and Hornqvist alternating
2. Rust with Malkin with Zucker and Marleau alternating
3. McCann and Simon with Marleau and Hornqvist alternating
4. Tanev-Blueger-Rodrigues
We have to find a way to keep Riikola in the lineup. He's not perfect, and he may not even be good, but he's markedly better than several other options we have.
I also think JJ's been much better with Marino this season than Petts has. As weird as that is to say.
Dumo-Letang
JJ-Marino
Petts-Riikola
We won't, but we should.
This is a joke, right?Looks like this team is in a free fall. At best, one and done in the playoffs. If Crosby does not win another cup, is he a hall of famer? After all, other players did the heavy lifting during the out her cup runs. Personally, I am on the fence.
Boy do I hate the idea of playing Marino on his off side in order to appease a defenseman that's been garbage for almost 3 years now.JJ-Riiko's results actually aren't all that bad.
Let's stack em up:
Dumo-Letang
Marino-JS
MP/JJ-Riiko
Boy do I hate the idea of playing Marino on his off side in order to appease a defenseman that's been garbage for almost 3 years now.
Schultz sucks, in every zone. Petts sucks in every zone too, but he plays LD. JJ sucks above the bottom pairing where he's getting sheltered minutes--except when being buoyed by Marino. Ruh's an AHL guy who shouldn't be getting legit minutes.
I dunno, man. I think Schultz might be the worst of the bunch. And that's something, because I've been raking Petts over coals all season for his rough play.JS can atleast make a first pass when he's "plays well" atm. Something MP can't do.
I play my best 4 puck moving defenseman in the top 4.
Figure it out.
I dunno, man. I think Schultz might be the worst of the bunch.
I'd legit rather run Riikola/JJ-Marino and JJ/Riikola-Ruh as our 2nd and 3rd pairs than play Schultz in a prominent role and force Marino to his off side.
Looks like both JM and Dumo are wearing contact jerseys today.
Best news ever.
My exact reactionLooks like both JM and Dumo are wearing contact jerseys today.
Best news ever.