Taken to another thread, but I just want you to know that I have no issues with you. I just think your logic and arguments are lacking but am still looking for examples where you're correct over an NHL GM's decision.
...
While you certainly have a minority view on how the Pens should operate, and I do not fully disagree with it, I just think you should take a less absolute stance. I hate to take a fully
@ColePens stance on things because of far too optimistic reasons, but I THINK I get where you come from. You should be more open to other ideas. For instance:
I wanted Yakupov on the Pens years ago, but that wasn't the hill I was going to die on.
A certain amount of fisticuffs is needed, but shouldn't be a priority.
Just because a player showed flashes of brilliance in the Juniors does not mean that translates to the NHL. Same in the AHL.
There's posters here who watch our prospects more than you and I think you should take their word on their evaluations. I get you watch the AHL but we have posters here who are essentially paid scouts.
Look, if we listened to my opinion on hockey players we'd still have Johannes Salomonsson and Jonathan Filewich on the team.