Without an extension, good luck getting that.
The thread title literally says sign and trade..
Without an extension, good luck getting that.
NoMax Pacioretty Signed 2 years x 5.5M
for
Tanner Pearson
Michael Amadio
Lol as if bjugstad didn't benefit playing with barkov and dadonov on the WING last year. And I know how many panther fans didn't even want bjugstad there. I wouldn't fall for the clear attempt of pumping and dumping a 35 to 40 pt guy in reality. It's actually pathetic on how with this linemates and pp time he only managed 49 pts. That's awful. A 6'6 player that doesn't use his size either. I've seen enough of bjugstad to know that he's overrated as hell. Plays in a nowhere market and people just assume he's a good player...he aint. He's mediocre.doubt florida would want to trade a 6'6C that outscored patches last year + a pick 15 for mad max
Patches doesn't get Bjugstad straight up? Are you crazy?? I'd walk up to Bergevin and fire him myself if he made that tradeLol...good one....patches doesn't get Bjustad straight up, and you want a first round pick also?....are you MB?
The thread title literally says sign and trade..
Great. You'd still be fishing to get that even with the signing.
Lol...good one....patches doesn't get Bjustad straight up, and you want a first round pick also?....are you MB?
Why would Montreal sign him then trade him, couldn't the team that trades for him sign him on july 1 themselves?
Well its not "California", where everyone wants to live, haven't you heard?Yeah but haven't you heard, Montreal is a ****hole.
Rick Nash for a first round pick , a def prospect,Beleskey and Spooner......And Pacc is 3-4 years younger than Nash ...and Bjugstad=0.49 ppg and -51Patches doesn't get Bjugstad straight up? Are you crazy?? I'd walk up to Bergevin and fire him myself if he made that trade
Oh i see. Yeah,as long as the acquiring team knows the extension expectations there is no need for a sign and trade.I understand that which is why I asked why does Montreal have to sign him in this scenario because the team trading for him could do it on July 1, 2018 themselves
Oh i see. Yeah,as long as the acquiring team knows the extension expectations there is no need for a sign and trade.
Max Pacioretty Signed 2 years x 5.5M
for
Tanner Pearson
Michael Amadio
Yes, he'll be in Stl next year. Which one was St. Catharines?Not related to this, but curious...
Is Thomas NHL ready next year?
I watched him during the playoffs in St. Catharines and he didn’t really seem ready to me, but admittedly I only saw him play during those games, so...???
Rick Nash for a first round pick , a def prospect,Beleskey and Spooner......And Pacc is 3-4 years younger than Nash ...and Bjugstad=0.49 ppg and -51
Pacc=0.72 ppg and +36
You were saying.
Lets just step back for a second and asses the logic of this post... Why does 29 year old soon to be UFA who has shown he can score 35 sign a 2 year deal?Max Pacioretty Signed 2 years x 5.5M
for
Tanner Pearson
Michael Amadio
Well its not "California", where everyone wants to live, haven't you heard?
Oh i see. Yeah,as long as the acquiring team knows the extension expectations there is no need for a sign and trade.
Outside the box idea, but I presume it's illegal following the CBA to retain salary on a contract that hasn't kicked in yet? Say for example we do a sign and trade (4 years @ 6.5M), could the team retain something like 750K or 1M on that deal or no?