- Oct 31, 2007
- 39,213
- 41,097
Tagging @saraciv420 because this needs to be addressed urgently
More importantly, does he have the Trippisms thread framed somewhere in his house?
Tagging @saraciv420 because this needs to be addressed urgently
Oh, I love "Black Magic Woman"SINÄ SAATANA
Quite frankly, I'd like to see far more investigative rigor on behalf of the journalists who are bent on destroy this man's career.
All I have read so far is vague references to a "slur", and now they can't even decide if it was racist, homophobic or antisemitic. I want to know precisely what it was he said. For all we know, he called have called a referee a "er". Despite being a rather banal insult, now in the circle of wokedom, it is considered a homophobic slur.
I can't imagine it would take that much effort to interview his teammates from that incident and find out what he actually said. Unless of course, they already know what he said and are deliberately not exposing it because they know people would shrug.
Which journalists were responsible for him getting shit-canned by the Rangers?Quite frankly, I'd like to see far more investigative rigor on behalf of the journalists who are bent on destroy this man's career.
All I have read so far is vague references to a "slur", and now they can't even decide if it was racist, homophobic or antisemitic. I want to know precisely what it was he said. For all we know, he called have called a referee a "er". Despite being a rather banal insult, now in the circle of wokedom, it is considered a homophobic slur.
I can't imagine it would take that much effort to interview his teammates from that incident and find out what he actually said. Unless of course, they already know what he said and are deliberately not exposing it because they know people would shrug.
That is the word that Getzlaf said when he got in hot water for using a homophobic slur in 2017.For all we know, he called have called a referee a "er". Despite being a rather banal insult, now in the circle of wokedom, it is considered a homophobic slur.
Honest to god the first time I heard about this being a “slur” was the conversation the other day.That is the word that Getzlaf said when he got in hot water for using a homophobic slur in 2017.
https://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/ducks-ryan-getzlaf-reaction-1.4126067
Eleven years to the Demolition Man year, and we are two down of the George Carlin's seven.Honest to god the first time I heard about this being a “slur” was the conversation the other day.
I mean, dig right down to it and I get it…just never thought about it.
Edit - I may have already said this. I have a terrible memory
Quite frankly, I'd like to see far more investigative rigor on behalf of the journalists who are bent on destroy this man's career.
All I have read so far is vague references to a "slur", and now they can't even decide if it was racist, homophobic or antisemitic. I want to know precisely what it was he said. For all we know, he called have called a referee a "er". Despite being a rather banal insult, now in the circle of wokedom, it is considered a homophobic slur.
I can't imagine it would take that much effort to interview his teammates from that incident and find out what he actually said. Unless of course, they already know what he said and are deliberately not exposing it because they know people would shrug.
So, the onus is to not be an anusThe onus is on him now to prove that he's something other than what he has demonstrated himself to be.
Quite frankly, I'd like to see far more investigative rigor on behalf of the journalists who are bent on destroy this man's career.
So, the onus is to not be an anus
Got it
The salient point underlying all of this is that the slur was a violation of OHL rules, which got him suspended, and then there was behavior that subsequently got him traded from that OHL team.
Let's be clear: however much you may think that journalists are piling on, TDA did this damage to himself, and that's why he was available for a 1 year show me deal. The onus is on him now to prove that he's something other than what he has demonstrated himself to be.
So, the onus is to not be an anus
Got it
The onus is not on us not to be an anus, it's on TDA not to be a PITA.
I disagree that the OHL rule violations are the salient point. If he had violated other rules, such as curfew policy, or drinking, or any number of things and got suspended, nobody would care.
The stridency of the articles written in opposition to him coming to the Canes are predicated nearly entirely on the nature of what he said in the OHL. Yet nobody can seem to find out what exactly he said. Which is outrageous.
I agree that he did this to himself and has to prove that he can behave like a civilized human being now. But these people don't think he deserves that chance and that the Canes organization should be punished for having the audacity to extend it to him.
Yes. And lots of folks agree with that assessment, including the 31 other NHL GMs who were not willing to give him that chance.
The slur is the easiest thing to attach the story to. Maybe that's unfortunate or unfair. But if he'd been a model citizen since, it wouldn't be a big deal. He hasn't been. He's a (very?) good player that multiple orgs have given away for nothing.
We want to be the opportunity? Fine. But don't be surprised when the reactions are what they are.
I got a DUI when I was like 19 and got my name in the paper which was devastating. Lost my job and all. It sucked. Never once did it occur to me I could simply blame the reporter who typed up the police blotter that day. That would've been so much easier than dealing with the consequences of my f***up
Yes. And lots of folks agree with that assessment, including the 31 other NHL GMs who were not willing to give him that chance.
The slur is the easiest thing to attach the story to. Maybe that's unfortunate or unfair. But if he'd been a model citizen since, it wouldn't be a big deal. He hasn't been. He's a (very?) good player that multiple orgs have given away for nothing.
We want to be the opportunity? Fine. But don't be surprised when the reactions are what they are.
So, 8 years later, when you got a new job, did a reporter come hound you about that DUI at 19?
But you had to settle for a million dollar job instead of 5.3M one?It didn't take me 8 years to get a new job bro
But you had to settle for a million dollar job instead of 5.3M one?
We don't know if the other GMs agree with the assessment of if they or their boss just were wary of the heat that was bound to come with the signing. Seeing that Canes was in hurry to get it done on the day one, it kind of looks like it wasn't a question of if but when with one or more GMs too.
My scenario covered for the Canes' hurry. TDA hurry may have been because he wanted ink on paper before the twitter backlash on the potential signing might make Canes back out from signing him. The supposed TDA/relative burner account posting calling out Canes as clowns on the Free Agency Day was a curious one.If he or his agent had thought for a second that they were going to do better than a 1x1 deal, they would have waited for it.