Nithoniniel
Registered User
We're talking about two of our three best players here. We need them to do more than just try to stay alive.
What do you expect to be happening? The Bergeron line has only scored in 1 game 5on5 head to head vs them. How does that fit your narrative?We're talking about two of our three best players here. We need them to do more than just try to stay alive.
They have been on the ice for four goals against at 5-on-5, worst off any line, with absolutely dreadful underlying metrics. They don't really score at all. It's not just about the Bergeron line. That's not all of their minutes, and that's not all of what they are doing.What do you expect to be happening? The Bergeron line has only scored in 1 game 5on5 head to head vs them. How does that fit your narrative?
They have been on the ice for four goals against at 5-on-5, worst off any line, with absolutely dreadful underlying metrics. They don't really score at all. It's not just about the Bergeron line. That's not all of their minutes, and that's not all of what they are doing.
Oh no!! 4 goals 5 on 5 over 6 games. Insane!!! 3 of them matched up against the best line in the league. The Tavares line has scored 2 against them. You honestly can't be this ignorant.
You are delusional in your expectations. They are doing their job. Bergeron line has only scored in one game head to head vs them 5 on 5. You still haven't addressed this point. Pathetic.
Yeah I'm done responding to these guys. They make their cookie cutter "They need to score" comments over and over that just shows they have no clue what is going on out there.Thse are just scorned fans holding on to old school narratives because Babcock is dumb or Matthews/Nylander are better or all of the above.
I did address that point, by saying that they are responsible for all their minutes and not just those played against Bergeron.Oh no!! 4 goals 5 on 5 over 6 games. Insane!!! 3 of them matched up against the best line in the league. The Tavares line has scored 2 against them. You honestly can't be this ignorant.
You are delusional in your expectations. They are doing their job. Bergeron line has only scored in one game head to head vs them 5 on 5. You still haven't addressed this point. Pathetic.
I did address that point, by saying that they are responsible for all their minutes and not just those played against Bergeron.
Counter-point, how is it delusional to expect more than 3 combined points, dreadful underlying metrics, and four goals against from arguably our two best players? Mitch Marner has been on for 11(!) goals against in total, second worst in the playoffs. I don't think I've ever heard of someone setting the bar so low for star players.
You go ahead and call people ignorant, insane, and pathetic though. Kind of speaks to the desperation in your position.
If you want to set your expectation for our two best players as just not getting scored on by the line they face the most then that is up to you. I don't think anyone will agree with you that it's the only expectation to have on one of the best lines of the regular season.I've already explained probably a dozen times that they are in a SHUTDOWN role against the best line in the league and they have done that. That is why they are playing with Muzzin and Zaitsev and not Rielly.
Incorrect. The fact they have Muzzin/Zaitsev with them proves they are in a shutdown role. If it were otherwise Rielly (their clear best defenceman) would be out there as well.
Not to mention Babcock is also making changes on the fly on the road to get the matchup as well.
I did address that point, by saying that they are responsible for all their minutes and not just those played against Bergeron.
Counter-point, how is it delusional to expect more than 3 combined points, dreadful underlying metrics, and four goals against from arguably our two best players? Mitch Marner has been on for 11(!) goals against in total, second worst in the playoffs. I don't think I've ever heard of someone setting the bar so low for star players.
You go ahead and call people ignorant, insane, and pathetic though. Kind of speaks to the desperation in your position.
So u think we upgraded from kadri and komarov to JT and Marner this year, only to acheived the same goal.
Muzzin and Zaitsev have been solid so far. As I said people need to stop making excuses, if we had Rielly there everyone would be saying it's Hainsey's or Hyman's fault.
Simple fact, they havent been good enough and need to be better. JT and Marner are the type of players that can carry the players around them and thats why I expect them to tear it up next game. Frankly, thats our only chance of winning atm.
The only line I'm impressed by is the fourth line, to be honest. The Nylander line can honestly not do much more than occasionally win the possession battle. The Tavares line is on their heels. The Matthews line makes things happen, but I kind of still feel that it happens in isolation.Better watch out, people don't like facts that don't look good for the "golden boys" on this board, no matter how badly there playing
It's much, much more fun complaining about non "good Toronto boys" than having to take a good hard long look at the current "fan favorites"
I'm not particularly impressed with Tavares or Nylander lines right now but I get the feeling that's going to be controversial
Hey, there's something we can agree on.I think this could be a far different series if we had Kadri/Nylander on the 3rd line. Instead we have Nylander and 2 wingers who can't generate any offense.
The difference in this series has been special teams. We aren't losing on the backs of Tavares/Marner 5on5. That's for sure... Bergeron line has only scored against them in 1 game so far.
If you want to set your expectation for our two best players as just not getting scored on by the line they face the most then that is up to you. I don't think anyone will agree with you that it's the only expectation to have on one of the best lines of the regular season.
I think this could be a far different series if we had Kadri/Nylander on the 3rd line. Instead we have Nylander and 2 wingers who can't generate any offense.
The difference in this series has been special teams. We aren't losing on the backs of Tavares/Marner 5on5. That's for sure... Bergeron line has only scored against them in 1 game so far.
The only line I'm impressed by is the fourth line, to be honest. The Nylander line can honestly not do much more than occasionally win the possession battle. The Tavares line is on their heels. The Matthews line makes things happen, but I kind of still feel that it happens in isolation.
Hey, there's something we can agree on.
I think you being generous with that one
The Tavares line is getting overrun as the series progresses, the Nylander line is just there, the 4th line tries but not much happens and Matthews scores on the Matthews line while the other two have had their moments but have been quiet overall
Then take special teams into account, it's not the prettiest of pictures
The Tampa Bay did exactly that last year.Do you think Babcock (or any top hockey mind for that matter) came into this series with your idea that Tavares/Marner should be outplaying Bergeron/Marchand?
I think you should spend less time talking about me and more time talking about the subject.You seem unable to use any sort of reasoning beyond "they should be scoring more". Any reasonable person is taking into account all the factors of the situation and realizing what type of a roll they are in and judging them relative to the line they are up against.
You are using an extremely limited absolute approach to judging them rather than a broader relative approach. That is your flaw and why you don't have a clear picture of what is happening.
The Tampa Bay did exactly that last year.
If you put two of the best players in the world on a line, your expectation can't be that they are just not to be killed by the opposing top line. But let's accept your premise and say that it's fine that they are on their heels against the Bergeron line given what they are. That just accentuates the issue that they are losing in the other half of their minutes against lesser opposition while not giving us any production. Struggling against Bergeron is fine, but two guys like that shouldn't struggle against Boston's mid six.
I think you should spend less time talking about me and more time talking about the subject.
Can someone post the link where Shanny/Dubas or Babs said the JT lines role in this series was to try to play D and they didn't want/expect them to score ?
I can't seem to find any quotes .