CanadianPensFan1
Registered User
Well, that was kinda the point I was making.
The NHL used to be LITTERED with one-dimensional 40-goal scorers. Virtually all 21 teams had one in the 80's.
Personally, I think guys who can score goals need to be cut WAY MORE slack. Look at soccer. Strikers are by and large prima donnas who have nowhere near the same work rate as the rest of the team. And yet, they make all the money and get all the glory. Why? Because the game needs goals and they are hard to come by.
If the NHL continues down the current road, we should start to cherish 40-goal-scorers way more than we do now.
Joel Quenneville gets it. He demands two-way play from everybody, except Kane. He makes an exception for a truly special offensive talent.
That's how it should be. Not all players are created equally.
While I absolutely agree with you, you have to take into account that its a different era.
In the 84-85 season, the highest scoring team had over 400 goals. The LOWEST scoring team had 253 goals. Last season, the highest scoring team had 260 goals.
Now, sure, some of that can be attributed to the fact that there are less one dimensional 40 goal guys. But I think the larger portion of that is .. the game is just different. In its current state (dead puck, clutch and grab), no team will ever score 400 goals again. It just wont happen. Not to mention coaching schemes are way more involved.
I also think that players, particularly in North America, are groomed to be better "overall players" as opposed to one dimensional.