Eyedea
The Legend Continues
Sure. I dont doubt that he can do it once in while. But his numbers are still much better as a RF than CF and i know that isnt news to anyone. But he got that contract based off of what he can bring to the table offensive and defensively. If he was a league average defender then he probably isnt getting more than 50-60M based on his bat. He was and is an elite RF, why mess with that. Let him play the position he knows and maybe spend time working on his offensive rather than a new position which could lower his value. Though i can get on board that he could bring more value to the team as a whole as CF i just dont think his body would hold up over the course of a season. Seems too big to play CF long term. Too much ground to cover.
I just never seen a 6'5 250 pound player play an elite CF or CF for a long period of time and have success - i guess that's my main concern. I think the Cubs are playing with fire if they put him CF as it could affect his long term value (health). I guess there is no harm or foul if they dont like the fit as nothing is stopping him from moving back. But when you invest that kind of money in player then i think you should let him continue with what he was good at.
It is a moot point as it sounds like the Cubs are going with Fowler in CF which i think is the right choice.
My point is that he's so far and away the best defensive RF that he would still be elite in CF. Plenty of articles have surfaced over the years questioning why managers and organizations have refused to fully transition him to CF. Part of that reason is because his body profile is more suited to the corner, but his route efficiency and range is more than suitable or average for the position. Mike Trout is what, 6'2 230? I'm sure there's several other examples that I can't really bother to look up right now.