LegionOfDoom91
Registered User
yeah is a very good 4 line player
he deserve a chance
laughton-couturier-read
rinaldo- talbot/newbury- rosehill
May I suggest watching Boxing or UFC? I think it's more up your alley than watching hockey.
yeah is a very good 4 line player
he deserve a chance
laughton-couturier-read
rinaldo- talbot/newbury- rosehill
May I suggest watching Boxing or UFC? I think it's more up your alley than watching hockey.
is funny because vs washington when erskine punch a player for no reason
you want mathers vs erskine no?
is funny because vs washington when erskine punch a player for no reason
you want mathers vs erskine no?
I don't have a problem with Rosehill stapled to the bench for the odd couple of shifts to exchange unpleasantries with the opposing goon, but he shouldn't be taking a regular shift even on the 4th line.
Still think Raffl wins the 3LW spot over Laughton
I hope Raffl is good, but I also hope he doesn't take the spot Laughton woulda had.. Any chance Newbury stays up? I really like him as a 4th line guy.
rosehill is a enforcer who can play in nhl boll,thornton,reaves type of players
is not a scott,MacIntyre type of player play 1 minute game
rosehill is a enforcer who can play in nhl boll,thornton,reaves type of players
is not a scott,MacIntyre type of player play 1 minute game
Where do you guys see Akeson sitting at in the case of injuries to the Flyers line-up throughout the season? 2nd or 3rd callup? Later?
Where do you guys see Akeson sitting at in the case of injuries to the Flyers line-up throughout the season? 2nd or 3rd callup? Later?
Didn't see the game Monday, but it seemed like he played a bit passive yesterday. I'm not going to judge 1 preseason game, due to a number of on going factors though. It's obvious when he signed it was with the intention he would be playing for the big club. I look forward to seeing what he can bring in the upcoming weeks.
Where do you guys see Akeson sitting at in the case of injuries to the Flyers line-up throughout the season? 2nd or 3rd callup? Later?
Him [Akeson] and McGinn are probably the top 2.
Rosehill is the shortest midget at that circus. Boll, Thornton, and Reaves bring much more to the table than Rosehill does.
No to Mathers in lineup
No to Newbury in lineup
No to Rosehill in the lineup either.
We'll have Rinaldo in the lineup and possibly Hall. Not to mention Simmonds will drop the gloves if he needs to. Not saying they'll win the fights necessarily, but they won't let anyone get pushed around.is funny because vs washington when erskine punch a player for no reason
you want mathers vs erskine no?
I didn't see Raffl the first game, but the last game he was just ok. I think Talbot might me more productive on the third line. Raymond or Brunner will easily outproduce Raffl and I am not convinced his defensive game is spectacular. Hopefully he does more than Pyorala.
Lavy has talked about Vinny and Simmonds having chemistry from the start and the control down low Hartnell-Vinny-Simmonds has been praised enough that I think that line might be set to start the season at least.
I thought VandeVelde played well. Lavy also mentioned his play in the post game interview. I imagine he is just fighting for an nhl contract and being a potential call up. One article mentioned the Flyers wanted to keep Laughton as a center which would leave him battling for the 4c with Hall and perhaps VandeVelde. Having said that, I can't imagine a 4th line with two rookies if Talbot is on the third.
It does not say much for Meszaros, Gustafsson and Gervais that Gill has not been released yet and Lauridsen is still in the running (although Lauridsen's commitment this summer and gaining muscle has been mentioned). I don't think Meszaros would be claimed if he was waived. Gustafsson has disappointed and Gervais is Gervais.
Raffl looked better the first game. Lead the team in shots and overall was buzzing around the net. He himself said he was disappointed with his offensive play the 2nd game. Lacy went on to say though that they wanted to see how he did in a checking line role not offensive like the 1st game.
Overall I agree that his 2nd game wasn't good but those who watched his first saw that he looked like an NHL player easily when on a scoring line. And it wasn't Vinny or Simmonds carriying the play either. A lot of the time it was Raffl pushing the play into the offensive zone. Would like to see one more game of him on a decent scoring line to make sure it isn't a one game thing.
lol boll 1.7m .thornton 1m
rosehill 0.7m
rosehill 27years is better that thornton 36 years
Your fault.