Not that they don't deserve it, but this award is all about reputation these days.
"Best defensive forward" translated into NHL language:
"Best two-way center in a big market"
Because no one cares about it.
Just a trophy for 2nd rate players who never win any real trophies.
Because no one cares about it.
Just a trophy for 2nd rate players who never win any real trophies.
Because no one cares about it.
Just a trophy for 2nd rate players who never win any real trophies.
Care to explain why low-scoring players are never nominated then?
Guys like Kopitar, Toews and Bergeron, and any other forward on such a level, is playing so many minutes and dominating the play so much that they're bound to put up good offensive numbers. I would question a 3rd liner's claim to the award because at this point an elite defensive forward won't be on a team's third line.Care to explain why low-scoring players are never nominated then?
They are. Mike Peca won a Selke with 49 points, Draper won a Selke with 40 points.
They WERE... There isn't any point to considering NHL media and landscapes scenarios of the past relevant. Based on the NHL post lockout year there hasn't been a lower pt scoring player getting the award.
I'll give ya, even in the 2001 range John Madden or some of the others still got the award with only decent offense but that's not where the NHLs mindset is anymore.
Putting up 49 points is pretty good offensive production. There have been a lot of guys who did well in voting recently with points in the low 50's. It's also important to know that Draper's 40 points was a big time career year for him offensively and he never did that well in Selke voting before or after.They WERE... There isn't any point to considering NHL media and landscapes scenarios of the past relevant. Based on the NHL post lockout year there hasn't been a lower pt scoring player getting the award.
I'll give ya, even in the 2001 range John Madden or some of the others still got the award with only decent offense but that's not where the NHLs mindset is anymore.
Yep. That silly Conn Smythe. Another BS trophy.
Putting up 49 points is pretty good offensive production. There have been a lot of guys who did well in voting recently with points in the low 50's. It's also important to know that Draper's 40 points was a big time career year for him offensively and he never did that well in Selke voting before or after.
John Madden literally finished 2nd in voting in 07-08 with only decent offense.
Pahlsson very narrowly lost the award (420 to 405 voting points) in 07 with 8 goals and 26 points in a high scoring year. That would've been the lowest point total to ever win it. Pandolfo finished third with 27 points.
It totally is, just like any award voted on by the media
Because no one cares about it.
Just a trophy for 2nd rate players who never win any real trophies.
Ahh, so all trophies are worthless an have no baring in a players standing vs his peers?
I think it's a second tier trophy (first tier being the Hart/Lindsay/Art Ross), along with the Richard, but it's still a HUGE honour to be win the Selke. Being voted the best defensive forward in the league is nothing to shake a stick at.Because no one cares about it.
Just a trophy for 2nd rate players who never win any real trophies.
What do you know? It's the same three guys as last year, none of whom are truly the best defensive forward in the league