Value of: Seguin Trade

[1972]

Nope. Seguin would 1000% be Winnipeg’s #1 C. He he is way better then Scheifele.

No he isn't better then Scheifele.

 

[Dr Pepper]

No he isn't better then Scheifele.

Well, certainly not at RPS, that's for sure.

Schiefele's got his number on that one.

 

[57special]

I mean, Seguin would be exactly what the Wild need, but I don't get why he would leave DAL, nor would it be easy to make a trade between teams in the same division. Also, as good as Seguin is, there is a limit as to what I would want to pay him.

 

[TheAngryHank]

Ryan O'Rielly + +

 

[Fro]

If he is actually available CBJ should be all in on him...agree with earlier poster, I'd go panarin+ but I'd add wennberg (a 2c backfill) for Seguin with some sort of add... (thinking 2nd and B prospect, but that's negligible)

 

[Unspecified]

No he isn't better then Scheifele.

Yes , yes he is. The only year Scheifele was better was the season before last where Seguin had a down year. Once Scheifele can score more than 30 goals once let me know.

 

[glovesave_35]

If he is actually available CBJ should be all in on him...agree with earlier poster, I'd go panarin+ but I'd add wennberg (a 2c backfill) for Seguin with some sort of add... (thinking 2nd and B prospect, but that's negligible)

I don't understand any mention of Panarin. Seguin won't be traded before the season. So why would we trade expiring Seguin contract for an expiring Panarin? It makes zero sense.

Not sure what to think of Wennberg. 35 points in 66 games for 5 mil.

 

[1972]

Yes , yes he is. The only year Scheifele was better was the season before last where Seguin had a down year. Once Scheifele can score more than 30 goals once let me know.

It's not all about goals.

 

[Ivan13]

Where did you see this interview with Nill? Seems like a dumb thing for Nill to say lol

Well despite being HFB's darling for God knows how long Jim Nill isn't very good at his job, just like the cronies he put in place there. Just take a gander at their draft record.

 

[Unspecified]

It's not all about goals.

Or points? Or production year after year? All which Seguin has done better.

 

[Unspecified]

Well despite being HFB's darling for God knows how long Jim Nill isn't very good at his job, just like the cronies he put in place there. Just take a gander at their draft record.

Players acquired under Jim NIll for scraps!
Seguin
Peverley
Janmark
Spezza
Bishop
Radulov
Johns
Oduaya

Seems pretty good to me.

 

[Ivan13]

Players acquired under Jim NIll for scraps!
Seguin
Peverley
Janmark
Spezza
Bishop
Radulov
Johns
Oduaya

Seems pretty good to me.

A real impressive list, I hope he stays with the Stars for a long time and continues the briliant work he is doing. And I like how one of the best wingers in the game at the time of the Seguin trade is a scrap using some impressive mental gymnastics.

 

[Magic Mittens]

Well despite being HFB's darling for God knows how long Jim Nill isn't very good at his job, just like the cronies he put in place there. Just take a gander at their draft record.

Hes a good gm with trades and cap imo. His drafting hasn't been great, although I do like his last two drafts

 

[Unspecified]

A real impressive list, I hope he stays with the Stars for a long time and continues the briliant work he is doing. And I like how one of the best wingers in the game at the time of the Seguin trade is a scrap using some impressive mental gymnastics.

It was scraps in terms of the return smart guy, but please continue.

 

[1972]

Or points? Or production year after year? All which Seguin has done better.

Oh okay bud...

Scheifele last 3 years (203 Points in 210 Games = 0.97PPG)

Seguin last 3 years (223 Points in 236 Games = 0.94PPG)




[mod] Points are not everything, and even so he's right there with Seguin.

 

[Rebels57]

Less than HF Boards thinks, unless Dallas is trading with Ottawa or Edmonton.

 

[GeauxPreds1]

Oh okay bud...

Scheifele last 3 years (203 Points in 210 Games = 0.98PPG)

Seguin last 3 years (223 Points in 236 Games = 0.94PPG)




[mod] Points are not everything, and even so he's right there with Seguin.

Let's add a year
Scheifele last 4 years (252 points in 292 games =0.86ppg)

Seguin last 4 years (300 points in 305 games = 0.98ppg)

 

[1972]

Let's add a year
Scheifele last 4 years (252 points in 292 games =0.86ppg)

Seguin last 4 years (300 points in 300 games = 0.97ppg)

And Scheifele was a late blooming raw talent while Seguin was a second overall pick, four years ago is irrelevant. If anything, it just shows Scheifele is showing more year over year growth in his game.

 

[Dr Pepper]

Let's add a year
Scheifele last 4 years (252 points in 292 games =0.86ppg)

Seguin last 4 years (300 points in 300 games = 0.97ppg)

I'm no mathemachicken, but shouldn't that be 1ppg?

 

[GeauxPreds1]

And Scheifele was a late blooming raw talent while Seguin was a second overall pick, four years ago is irrelevant. If anything, it just shows Scheifele is showing more year over year growth in his game.

You acting like scheifele was a 2nd or 3rd rounder. He was drafted 1st round 7th pick

 

[GeauxPreds1]

I'm no mathemachicken, but shouldn't that be 1ppg?

Lol 305 games my bad lol

 

[Unspecified]

Oh okay bud...

Scheifele last 3 years (203 Points in 210 Games = 0.97PPG)

Seguin last 3 years (223 Points in 236 Games = 0.94PPG)




[mod] Points are not everything, and even so he's right there with Seguin.

I see you take a 3 year sample to fit your narrative. Like GeauxPred1 stated:

Let's add a year
Scheifele last 4 years (252 points in 292 games =0.86ppg)

Seguin last 4 years (300 points in 305 games = 0.98ppg)

We can go around and around as long as you want. All the seats at the kids table were taken up by misinformed Scheifele loyalists, sorry!

 

[MrHeiskanen]

It's not all about goals.

Points? Seguin
Faceoffs? Seguin
PK Minutes? Seguin
Defensive zone starts? Seguin
CF%? Equal

So.. what is Schief better at?

 

[1972]

You acting like scheifele was a 2nd or 3rd rounder. He was drafted 1st round 7th pick

He was a 7th OA pick who was an OHL rookie and was always seen as a late bloomer.

 

[1972]

I see you take a 3 year sample to fit your narrative. Like GeauxPred1 stated:



We can go around and around as long as you want. All the seats at the kids table were taken up by misinformed Scheifele loyalists, sorry!

I have no horse in this race. But who the f*** cares about 4 seasons ago and how does that have any relavance to whose better today? [mod]