You hear this stuff about acting like a professional, but what are the stories and why do you only hear about them when the team decides to move on? This whole deal sounds too eerily similar to what we heard when they moved Kessel. He didn't put in the work, he didn't want to be defensively responsible, etc. The underlying theme here is that we've heard this routine before, and it was with the last purely offensive guy they had, and here it is yet again with Seguin. I don't think it's a coincidence that this is happening. I also think it's a huge mistake to expect all your players to be solid two way players, and expect everyone to be the same. It should be a mix of all sorts, and guys should know their roles. In this case, all they seem to want is the same mid tier guys. For a team that was already lacking elite offensive talent, it doesn't make much sense to me to trade him for a selke caliber type. I look at this deal, and they've gotten worse up front, IMO. Chia sold low, and devalued the player on his way out of town. Pretty common theme around here, and pretty disappointing.
To sum it all up, I wasn't against moving Seguin, but I expected a better return simply based on the rumors last week. Some of those names supposedly being offered were better returns, IMO. I like Eriksson too, but not as the centerpiece of a deal for their best asset.