Mobiandi
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2015
- 21,054
- 17,495
Is this your first time watching the Flames?He was as invisible against the Oilers as Pettersson was against the Leafs last night, and Pettersson wasn't even in the lineup.
Is this your first time watching the Flames?He was as invisible against the Oilers as Pettersson was against the Leafs last night, and Pettersson wasn't even in the lineup.
First time in a while.Is this your first time watching the Flames?
Positives
-much improved on Faceoffs, must of worked hard on it over the offseason
-Point Production, still produces fairly well albeit on the lower end side of a 1C(obviously still young)
-PP composure, doesn't panic with the puck and is getting better at finding open ice
-Net Presence, one of our better forwards at getting the puck to the net and then following up
-Along the boards, he's improved comparative to last season, although I wouldn't count it as a strong aspect of his game
-Usually willing to take the shot when he has it, which we need more of
-Offensive Instincts, gets up the ice in a hurry when theres a chance for a fast break or an odd man rush
-Learning of the Center position, has improved as far as being where he should be, plays a very "efficient" game and supports the puck well
Negatives
-Play in the D zone, still see him "waving" at guys far too often, relies too much on his defencemen to get the puck out, gets hemmed in sometimes against other teams top lines
-Speed, don't think he'll ever be the fastest guy, but goes through periods of looking winded and overwhelmed with the minutes he's getting
-Not enough of a catalyst, has taken a step back this year IMO as far as creating chances for himself, too often differs to Johnny or TJ to make things happen, his rookie year he scored 22 goals mostly on his own volition so he certainly has the ability, turning into a bit of a "triggerman" and would like to see him take charge more often and create more as this is IMO the biggest responsibility of a 1C
-Zone Entries, tries to make a cute pass too much rather than going wide or cutting to the slot and firing a shot, needs to simplify.. he's not a playmaker of Gaudreau's caliber. Just get it deep
-Physicality, doesn't need to be running guys over but finish your checks! He's got a pretty big frame and could use it more often especially on the forecheck
There's no difference between our center depth and the one the Blues won the cup with.So more or less where we were 5 years ago. Unless Sutter can work a miracle I think we can let the dream of Monahan blossoming into an all situations dominant 1C die. He is what he is.
There's no difference between our center depth and the one the Blues won the cup with.
We don’t have the ROR of that year and we don’t have the depthThere's no difference between our center depth and the one the Blues won the cup with.
Sarcastic?There's no difference between our center depth and the one the Blues won the cup with.
Monahan, and many other players, fall into a category where they skate and play hockey standing up, which leads to people thinking they don't give effort. Matthews and Eichel are two guys who generate a lot of speed but aren't generally hunched over in a way youd expect guys who are speedsters to get speed. Monahan isn't in their tier skating wise, but the way he skates and handles the puck gives off a "lazy" vibe when his entire career thus far has been built upon taking abuse and fighting into the slot (something that a lazy player wouldn't do).I’m not so sure competitiveness is really the issue with Monahan. I think his sort of “boring” personality sometimes gives off that look, but honestly, when you watch him he is generally pretty engaged in battles and seems like he wants to win them. Like, you don’t have to be a Tkachuk to be competitive. I’m not arguing that Monahan is the most competitive guy out there, but I don’t see anything to suggest he’s “quit”. I think that’s lazy analysis. When people can’t decidedly pinpoint the problem easily the often default to “lazy” or “low IQ” (sometimes it’s true but other times it’s just lazy analysis).
I think right now it’s a combination of just a lack of high end skill and footspeed for him. Monahan always tries to play the same game as Gaudreau when he just doesn’t have the skill to do it. I look at the times when he’s able to play a down low cycle game when he gets the odd shift with Tkachuk or Bennett and you absolutely can’t question his effectiveness or competitiveness there.
I don’t think it makes a bunch of sense to have 23 and 13 glued to each other anymore and I hope Sutter sees that.
We can only hope. Phillips would look absolutely perfect in Ritchie’s spot too and Ritchie/Leivo can split 4th line RWI'll build a statue of Darryl if he separates Gaudreau and Monahan for a significant length of time
Gaudreau-Dube-Lindholm
Tkachuk-Backlund-Mangiapane
Bennett-Monahan-Ritchie
Lucic-Ryan-Leivo
Monahan continually being held to the standard of a top line C, when the people holding him to that standard are also the ones saying Lindholm is our 1C is hilariously hypocritical to me.
Maybe not but is ROR usually even comparable to 2019 ROR? I'd say on a normal season, he is actually pretty comparable to Lindholm. The Blues found a perfect fit, ROR had a career year and they won a cup, something that group will probably never do again. They were also one of the hardest working teams in hockey, which our group clearly isn't. So while it is possible to win with the center depth we have, I do agree that this group isn't capable of it.No one in the same stratosphere at ROR in that run.
Note that they certainly were not the hardest working team early that year.Maybe not but is ROR usually even comparable to 2019 ROR? I'd say on a normal season, he is actually pretty comparable to Lindholm. The Blues found a perfect fit, ROR had a career year and they won a cup, something that group will probably never do again. They were also one of the hardest working teams in hockey, which our group clearly isn't. So while it is possible to win with the center depth we have, I do agree that this group isn't capable of it.
Once they changed coaches they were. Very seldom did you see guys taking nights off. They also had some great depth and were carried, at times, by outstanding goaltending. I don't think anyone would ever say they were true contenders. They were simply good enough, for long enough, worked hard and good things happened. Thats basically where I see our club but if they're not will to work hard, we'll continue to see similar results.Note that they certainly were not the hardest working team early that year.
Yikes. This is factually just wrongHe is literally Mark Jankowski with an elite shot and a bit higher IQ.
Once they changed coaches they were. Very seldom did you see guys taking nights off. They also had some great depth and were carried, at times, by outstanding goaltending. I don't think anyone would ever say they were true contenders. They were simply good enough, for long enough, worked hard and good things happened. Thats basically where I see our club but if they're not will to work hard, we'll continue to see similar results.