there are 2 things here I would like to address 1 ) if I am not mistaken , I do not think that if a team elects to take a player to arbitration like they did that they are ALLOWED to walk away from the arbitrators decision as they were the ones to take him there . 2) maybe in their discussions they had already agreed to a WINK WINK NUDGE NUDGE agreement ...we need this 2nd buyout window opened to address team needs a little more ...we will take you to arbitration to open this window ..and give you a modest raise after a poor year to redeem yourself in exchange for this ...team elected arb is to have salary remain the same or reduce it ...since they qualified him and he did not elect ARB himself he would have received a 10% raise on his base from last year of 3.6 mil . That would have been 360 k and made his salary 3.96 mil ...60 k difference, semantics really ...we will take you there to open THE WINDOW ..but instead of trying to have salary stay the same or reduced we will sign you for pretty much what we would have if we didn't take you there ...IMHO