Bruinfanatic
Registered User
Blues beat the Sharks with there size and physicality,Columbus had a few big guys who did most of the physical play for them ,it wasn’t enough.Blues physicality dominated Bruins for long stretches throughout this series resulting in Bruins forwards getting gassed just trying to get the puck out of there own end.The Blues size and physical play was a huge reason towards them winning this series,Still think saying the Bruins wouldn’t have got past the first round if they had some bigger players is dumb,depending on who those players were.But claiming the Bruins lost because of their lack of size isn't dumb?
Noone would have given a rats ass about the "lack of size" had the Sharks advanced.
Everyone mentioned the lack of size in the Columbus-series. But the Jackets got exposed eventually.
Had the Bruins lost against the Leafs, people would have wanted even more skill and speed to compete with them.
You can't build a team that matches well against every style.
The major issue in this series wasn't that the Bruins being inferior in the physical department.
Had the rules been enforced properly, this series would have turned out differently. I'm not just talking about those missed major penalties incl. ejections on the suspension fouls or that ridicilous game winner in game 5 ... but the games were called differently after game 3.
Bruins should have been up 3-0 after 10 minutes of game 7. They just didn't score. Size wouldn't have put the puck into the back of the net.
The Blues had 2 chances and scored 2 goals. That was the story of game 7.