Empoleon8771
Registered User
Not really, he doesn't PK, he doesn't hit, he hasn't been more than a third wheel in both our cup runs. He is a less versatile more offensively creative Dupuis. Look at what wingers get traded for.
Of all of the dumb player comparisons I've seen on this site over the years, I think this one takes the cake. No, seriously. It's just awful.
Nashville can afford to move one of their top four defensemen for a center
No they can't.
NYR can sell half their team for a top center. They could package Zibanjed or Hayes for an improvement.
Uh okay? The Penguins can do stupid things as well to bring in a guy like RNH. They could potentially trade any of Maatta, Hornqvist, Sheary, Rust or anyone crazy like that.
Montreal can package Galchenyuk.
The only logical point you made in this post, but even then, Galchenyuk isn't being traded for RNH. Galchenyuk is being traded for a better center than RNH.
You just said you wanted to trade for RNH, what to expect to move for him beyond Maatta / Dumo + a winger like Sheary / Rust?
Well seeing how RNH just had a 43 point season, I'm not going to trade a better defenseman plus a higher scoring winger for him, that's for sure.\
No, you're overvaluing a complimentary winger. He doesn't do anything, but put up points. He's really good at that, but he's still a winger in a game where centers and defense are what have value in a trade. If you're moving Sheary for a center you are getting a player like Bones when he came here that puts up 30 - 40 points, but is questionable. Wingers simply don't have value because they are too easy to find.
Last time I checked, putting up points is pretty damn important for winning games. I don't really care how 1 dimensional he is (he's not really 1 dimensional either, he's a pretty solid in all facets offensively) because you don't win games by getting hits or having your wingers be good defensively.