Or maybe we are owed another Schultz for a 3rd type of deal.The Pens have helped St. Louis and Detroit as of late. Maybe teams are starting to think we are charitable??
Or maybe we are owed another Schultz for a 3rd type of deal.The Pens have helped St. Louis and Detroit as of late. Maybe teams are starting to think we are charitable??
What's the deal with your avatar?
The Pens have helped St. Louis and Detroit as of late. Maybe teams are starting to think we are charitable??
This is great for the pens because Duchene isn't going to CBJ.
And is Ottawa even a better team after this trade?
Is Duchene better then Turris?
I don't want to post the tweet to what Friedman said, but dear lord, that's a lot for Duchene.
Any of the Knights Cs would be a good fit here I think. Haula, Eakin, Lindberg or Karlsson. They'd need to retain some salary on Eakin though.
It's pointless to continue to blindly suggest unfounded trade ideas with Vegas while they play well and in playoff contention. It's early in the season, and I'm sure they will collapse, but this is all moot until that happens.
We need to focus on teams like Buffalo, Arizona and Florida if you want to trade picks/prospects. If you don't like anyone from those team then we need to wait until teams figure out where they stand.
What would you offer for Bjugstad?
Which brings me to a new question...wonder if this in any way, shape, or form, makes Jarnkrok available?
It's pointless to continue to blindly suggest unfounded trade ideas with Vegas while they play well and in playoff contention.
It's early in the season, and I'm sure they will collapse.
Then why isn't it moot for Buffalo, Arizona and Florida? They could turn things around.
No it isn't, because...
Not really. They get a top 10 protected 1st (goes to OTT 2019 1st in that case), a 2nd, a 2019 3rd, Hammond (likely the reason for the 3rd), and 3 prospects - of which only 1 has played NHL games (5), and none of which are considered blue chip prospects. And those picks? All likely to be very late. Ottawa's 1st was #27 last year. Nashville's 2nd was 60th last year.
I'm not saying it's a bad return (we obviously will not know that for another 3+ years), but it's far from a great return. It's a LOT of quantity with very little quality.
Everything we post here is pointless, we're just fans. But if the collapse is inevitable, which I agree it is, it's worth it for management to make some calls and see who would be the best fit here, and what the asking prices might be.Well until they collapse this is all pointless. Let's look at teams that aren't #3 in their conference or very good young players signed to a six year contract with a $2 million cap hit.
They got basically 3 Sprong equivalent prospects. Yeah, they didn't get a prospect like Elias Pettersson, but they got some really good prospects. To say that they got "very little quality" is laughable, the Penguins don't even have 3 prospects on par with Kamanev, Bowers and Girard. They have Sprong, that's it.
Are you really going to challenge me on EVERYTHING?
Arizona has 5 friggin points this season. Florida made it clear this summer that they want to shed salary and aren't really competing. Further, there have been rumblings about Bjugstad being available. Buffalo isn't a good team and haven't been for years.
Vegas is currently sitting in 3rd in the western conference. Why exactly are they looking to make a deal for whatever crappy proposals you people will suggest?
But please, keep asking if the Preds will trade us Jarnkrok who is signed to 5 more years as $2 million cap hit a year. Keep dreaming, bro.
Not even close. Bowers isn't even in Ottawa's top 5 for prospects, and has already been surpassed by a handful of others. And Kamanov - someone who I really like and thought was a steal of a pick, hasn't progressed nearly as fast as many would like. And while he's doing well in the AHL, Sprong has as many goals as he has points. So that still falls short. Girard could be... but with only 11 pro games to his name (5 NHL, 6 AHL) it's way too soon to suggest that.
And just because Pittsburgh doesn't have 3 prospects at that level... doesn't mean much when we have one of the shallowest prospect pools in the league.
Edit. @ your edit. LOL, not even close.
It looks like they got something between the lindros return from Philly and the jagr return from Washington,Not even close. Bowers isn't even in Ottawa's top 5 for prospects, and has already been surpassed by a handful of others. And Kamanov - someone who I really like and thought was a steal of a pick, hasn't progressed nearly as fast as many would like. And while he's doing well in the AHL, Sprong has as many goals as he has points - and Sprong is a rookie while Kamanev is in his 3rd pro season). So that still falls short. Girard could be... but with only 11 pro games to his name (5 NHL, 6 AHL) it's way too soon to suggest that.
And just because Pittsburgh doesn't have 3 prospects at that level... doesn't mean much when we have one of the shallowest prospect pools in the league.
Edit. @ your edit. LOL, not even close.
Not even close. Bowers isn't even in Ottawa's top 5 for prospects, and has already been surpassed by a handful of others. And Kamanov - someone who I really like and thought was a steal of a pick, hasn't progressed nearly as fast as many would like. And while he's doing well in the AHL, Sprong has as many goals as he has points - and Sprong is a rookie while Kamanev is in his 3rd pro season). So that still falls short. Girard could be... but with only 11 pro games to his name (5 NHL, 6 AHL) it's way too soon to suggest that.
Maybe do a little research? Sprong has more than 50% of the goals Kamanev had in his rookie season and 30% of the points he had, and he's only played 10 games, and is putting up almost twice the PPG that Kamanev did in that season - which was 3 f***ing years ago. And even with Kamanev's previous pro seasons under his belt he's still not exceeding a PPG like Sprong is. No, these are not even close to equivalent players. @Girard and his 75 pts... Pouliot put up 70 in the WHL... what's your point? Dunn at least put up quality AHL numbers. And I'm 100% certain that if you asked HF who had more value, Kostin vs Bowers, damn near everybody would say Kostin. Kostin fell because he's a Russian, while Bowers was seen as a 2nd round pick, and has already been surpassed by other Ottawa prospects - including some from the same draft.Bowers was a 1st round pick in 2017. Kamanev is a PPG player in the AHL. Girard put up 75 points as a defenseman in the QMJHL last year. All of those prospects are on par with guys like Sprong and Kapanen. You're valuation of them is completely off.
How was my edit wrong? How is Dunn, Kostin and Barbashev better than Kamanev, Girard and Bowers? You have the young defenseman doing well in the NHL, the late 2017 1st round pick and the guy who has thrived in the AHL.