Dipsy Doodle
Rent A Barn
- May 28, 2006
- 76,572
- 21,111
I feel like fitting in Staal's 6 mil contract will be tough.
Trading Maatta would probably have to happen over the summer.
But that should probably happen anyway.
I feel like fitting in Staal's 6 mil contract will be tough.
Guentzel-Crosby-Simon
Pearson-Malkin-Kessel
Rust-Staal-Hornqvist
shit I didn't realize he still had 4 more yearsI'd be fine with it, but they'll suffer with that cap hit for another 4 years.
Also, what else is going their way? Brassard isn't gonna do it by himself, and I doubt picks and prospects will do. It would probably cost a Rust or Pearson add.
I'd be fine with it, but they'll suffer with that cap hit for another 4 years.
Also, what else is going their way? Brassard isn't gonna do it by himself, and I doubt picks and prospects will do. It would probably cost a Rust or Pearson add.
**** I didn't realize he still had 4 more years
**** I didn't realize he still had 4 more years
I feel like fitting in Staal's 6 mil contract will be tough.
at 6 mil? I'm not saying he's not a 6 mil center, I'm saying I don't know if we can afford a 6 mil 3C. Short term we could if we purged the D. Long term, we have to pay someone to play D.I think that's a feature, not a bug.
Maatta would have to go. About the only way.I feel like fitting in Staal's 6 mil contract will be tough.
short term that works. But then the next 4 years is when it could be a bigger issue.Maatta would have to go. About the only way.
I don't think it'd be "suffering". Staal's a full-menu center who can dominate possession and in the dot - 6 mil is about right for what he brings IMO.
I proposed Brass, Hallander, and a 1st.
at 6 mil? I'm not saying he's not a 6 mil center, I'm saying I don't know if we can afford a 6 mil 3C. Short term we could if we purged the D. Long term, we have to pay someone to play D.
True.
I doubt that's gonna do it For one, not enough salary going back, and why exactly would they send such good player for a UFA, Center prospect and a mid to late 1st?
That's lowballing. They are not forced to trade him for that, they'll just keep him.
That might get you Faulk though with a sweetner.
It seems to have gone over pretty well. Keep in mind that Staal is having a pretty down year by his standards.
I think Carolina needs him to do things as a 2C that aren't his forte, sort of like Brass at 3C here.
Would people really rather give up assets - and take on a ton of salary - for Staal than just signing Filppula in the offseason for like $3 million for a year or two?
Would people really rather give up assets - and take on a ton of salary - for Staal than just signing Filppula in the offseason for like $3 million for a year or two?
Why not Bozak out of St. Louis?
Million cheaper than Staal, 2 years left and you know the Kessel connection.
Filp's an unknown if he'd ever work here, older, 35+ rule and so on.
Would people really rather give up assets - and take on a ton of salary - for Staal than just signing Filppula in the offseason for like $3 million for a year or two?
Because Bozak sucks?
Would people really rather give up assets - and take on a ton of salary - for Staal than just signing Filppula in the offseason for like $3 million for a year or two?