KIRK
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 109,700
- 51,216
Any new news?
JR had a particularly difficult bowel movement last night after eating Carolina BBQ and washing it down by watching his team play the Canes.
Any new news?
If we get Brassard does that mean Sullivan brings back HBK? Bozak, Bonino, Brassard all are B names.
I agree with that, my point was more so they actually have produced at ES this year, which can't be said about Sheary's most common linemates. I don't think they're great at ES, they're just better than the **** that Sheary has had to play with. Kessel and Malkin have 13 5v5 goals combined, the best of the mentioned group is 7 between Crosby and Hornqvist.
What team would touch Hags without incentive with a 10 foot pole?
I guess I am a lot higher on Kamenev and Girard than you are, because I think that's an excellent haul for Colorado.
Let’s get rid of Hagelin somehow but we need a H to replace him.
Get a better H.
If Sprong really cements himself, for me, a guy like Jake enters possible trade bait material. I know it's hard to fathom but anything is up for grabs(sans Sid, G, Phil, Murray) depending on the return...
If Sprong really cements himself, for me, a guy like Jake enters possible trade bait material. I know it's hard to fathom but anything is up for grabs(sans Sid, G, Phil, Murray) depending on the return...
James Neal wasn't making near league minJames Neal was traded for Patrick Hornqivist laddies.
Never say never.
James Neal was traded for Patrick Hornqivist laddies.
Never say never.
Yeah, let's just refer to him as Preparation-H from now on.Get a better H.
James Neal was traded for Patrick Hornqivist laddies.
Never say never.
Again i prefaced that with IF Sprong really shines.
Unless you’re trading Guentzel for someone like Barzal or Tkachuk it shouldn’t happen.
And, if you’re getting someone like OEL I’d assume Letang is out. That changes trading Dumoulin or Maatta because it’s more than upgrading one of them. It’s replacing Letang and building the D around another player.
He isn't going to return anything great, but much like when we got him, his speed and defensive reputation combined with the B2B cup experience will make him valuable enough to someone.. the problem is that will get us some low pick, which is less useful than letting him try to work out scoring again
What if it’s the rangers acquiring him?When we got him, he was a guy who'd performed well with the Rangers who was struggling for half a season to adjust to playing in Anaheim.
He adjusted well to Pittsburgh for half a season and the playoffs before going into the crapper for the next year and a half.
Circumstances under which a team would be acquiring Hagelin now are nothing like what they were 2 years ago when the Pens acquired him.
What if it’s the rangers acquiring him?
No we’d still have Letang. My point is if we’re trading Guentzel it has to be a great deal for us or why bother.
I’m saying if they acquire another 1D it’s to replace Letang. I’d be shocked to see them rolling with two 1D and Sullivan would be seen passing out on the bench from the strain of managing them.
We're not trading Guentzel. After Sid, Geno, Murray, and Phil, he's the least likely player in the organization to be traded.