I do not see Edler, Hamhuis, Garrison or Bieksa being moved anytime soon as they have NTC's and they account for a cap hit of $18.7 million collectively over the next few seasons.Wow and we have him for 550k next year too. Between his 550k and Corrado's 591k this will give us some needed flexibility (also having $4.2M in Booth gone will be huge)
I don't really care about his shot, his rushes and pinches are often suspect and he doesn't know WHEN to put it on net. But yes his passes are uniformly decent.
You see Stanton often feathering in a wrist shot when he sees traffic. You never see Tanev doing that. Also Stanton changes his trajectory based on the situation. To me it's a really noticable difference between the two.
I do not see Edler, Hamhuis, Garrison or Bieksa being moved anytime soon as they have NTC's and they account for a cap hit of $18.7 million collectively over the next few seasons.
Tanev is due a raise this off-season as he is a pending RFA.
The problem will likely be that there is not much on the free agent market and the trade market???Yeah, so maybe we're looking at adding a 500k raise for Tanev, but otherwise we don't have many large D expenditures this offseason, goaltending is locked up as well, so we should have no excuses not to allocate significant funds to our forward core.
No...Brookbank and rozi are better. Dalhbeck, johns, dahlstrom, paliotta, ..heck even fournier, brown, and holl are better prospects.
I am glad Stanton got his chance and is doing well with it. He was a good player and did everything the team asked him too. Again our depth makes him going a non-issue. Much like trading former first rounder Olsen for Versteeg...it's all good in Chicago on the blue-line now and going forward.
While Stanton has looked dcent over a very small sample size, he's playing soft minutes. There's a reason why he went undrafted despite putting up important minutes in juniors. He's likely a 6-8 d-man in the NHL and probbaly won't have a long career. Every once in a while a player like Stanton will surprise, but it's way too early to say that he's going to be one of those guys. We shall see over the course of this year who he holds up.
He's looked pretty damn solid to me. Limited yes, but I think he's already surprised. See what the future holds for him, but from what I've seen so far, I wouldn't bet against him continuing to progress into a decent NHL defenceman.
Was happy to see him stand in there with a much bigger Jordan Nolan and stick up for his teammates. Those kinds of things are very positive signs for the team.
I agree, haven't really seen anyone else on the team step up in this regard... wasn't he the one who beat the crap out of a SJ player for snow showering Luongo as well?
While Stanton has looked dcent over a very small sample size, he's playing soft minutes. There's a reason why he went undrafted despite putting up important minutes in juniors. He's likely a 6-8 d-man in the NHL and probbaly won't have a long career. Every once in a while a player like Stanton will surprise, but it's way too early to say that he's going to be one of those guys. We shall see over the course of this year who he holds up.
...and to think people thought Sbisa would potentially displace him.
Why would Sbisa have to displace him? They're #5 and 6 on the depth chart.
And I don't think Stanton has played more than Sbisa yet this preseason...
Stanton has been a great pick up, and he continues to impress me. I love his game, its simple yet effective.