vorky
@vorkywh24
- Jan 23, 2010
- 11,420
- 1,282
Saying a journalist from North America who does not have a clue about the KHL by-laws. But fine.
I am pretty sure that there is some kind of unofficial agreement at least.Saying a journalist from North America who does not have a clue about the KHL by-laws. But fine.
Of course, there is an agreement between the player, Traktor & NYR. It says that Kravtsov will spend all 2020-21 season with Traktor Chelyabinsk in the KHL.I am pretty sure that there is some kind of unofficial agreement at least.
Now reading the confirmation from Traktor, here. All season with Traktor in the KHL or no deal.Of course, there is an agreement between the player, Traktor & NYR. It says that Kravtsov will spend all 2020-21 season with Traktor Chelyabinsk in the KHL.
It is a different situation as we see in other European leagues. Here, a loaned player will come back to North America when the pre-season starts in America because the loan agreement is written in that way. Because they have the transfer agreement with the NHL & the NHL does not honour the player´s contract with European club.
The KHL signed MoU with the NHL where both sides honour players´ contracts.
Saying a journalist from North America who does not have a clue about the KHL by-laws. But fine.
That is fine. He reported it but he has no clue about the issue, especially the KHL by-laws. And the NHL agents are the same. They say what North American audience wants to hear. Even though it is a lie.Don't know what to tell you, dude. That's what he reported.
That is fine. He reported it but he has no clue about the issue, especially the KHL by-laws. And the NHL agents are the same. They say what North American audience wants to hear. Even though it is a lie.
Just the plain truth. Wake up. We live in times of Twitter-journalism. Everybody is obsessed with clicks and reposts, nobody cares about facts.you're right, it's a conspiracy.
That is fine. He reported it but he has no clue about the issue, especially the KHL by-laws. And the NHL agents are the same. They say what North American audience wants to hear. Even though it is a lie.
I do not need to talk to him to know that his job is to cover the NHL or some NHL club, nothing else.How do you know that he doesn't know the KHL by-laws? Did you ask him?
I think you are putting too much into a one sentence tweet. The wording may not be incredibly precise, but I think the point he's trying to get across is clear.
Just the plain truth. Wake up. We live in times of Twitter-journalism. Everybody is obsessed with clicks and reposts, nobody cares about facts.
LOL what does it have to do with propaganda? We are not talking about politics. We are talking about a deteriorating social system in which following ever shorter lived hypes and trends to make a quick buck is presiding over every sensible aspect of handling information.propaganda/counter-intel slogans don't work on me. Brooks might be mistaken, but there's no agenda here. Not even sure how that even makes sense.
LOL what does it have to do with propaganda? We are not talking about politics. We are talking about a deteriorating social system in which following ever shorter lived hypes and trends to make a quick buck is presiding over every sensible aspect of handling information.
You are the one with the tin foil hat here.oh my, how melodramatic.
"wake up"
"don't believe everything you hear"
"don't trust sources"
all tactics used to sew distrust, it's not politics. It's basic fact. How does Brooks make a buck on a tweet that may or may not be misinformed?
Until you answer that with an explanation that borders on sanity, I'll just take what he said with a grain of salt as I always do and move on with my life without believing in baseless conspiracy theories spread by random HFboards users.
And even saddest thing is that one Russian journalist, actually not a Russian, used to do the same. Tweeting in a manner his American audience wanted to hear. He stopped doing it for obvious reasons.You are the one with the tin foil hat here.
He of course makes a a quick buck increasing the popularity of his Twitter account with
a.posts that are not well researched, but generate clicks
b.telling a specific audience exactly what that audience WANTS to hear, yet again imporving popularity and clicks for his account
And it is common practice. When NA reporters report about russian players or the KHL or Russia for that matter, they often make most ridiculous, untrue statements that are not borderline but obviously ignorant to the russian audience maybe, but due to lack of a proper picture of russian hockey and stereotypes about it(spread again by those same NA journalists) they hit the spot with the NA audience. They don't do it to mislead people though. That is all I wrote, tin foil hat, they do it because that is what is ecpected of them by the ausdience. That's just bad wag the dog journalism and sadly becoming more and more common though.
Lol 31 out of 31 organizations pick Kakko at 2 last season. The issue may be more with development than scouting. I also think Lias Andersson isn't a complete dud of a player and if he had been drafted by someone else he probably would be in the NHL right now. No superstar, for sure, but a strong role player.I think it’s both, organization and the players. Gordie Clark needs to be fired, and I’m not convinced Bobrov, the director of European scouting and perceived front runner to replace Clark, is any better.
The Kakko pick isn’t looking too great either through one year, although I’m much less concerned about his development and he doesn’t seem to have the same character issues as the prior two top ten picks.
I think it’s both, organization and the players. Gordie Clark needs to be fired, and I’m not convinced Bobrov, the director of European scouting and perceived front runner to replace Clark, is any better.
The Kakko pick isn’t looking too great either through one year, although I’m much less concerned about his development and he doesn’t seem to have the same character issues as the prior two top ten picks.
Jeezus, Kakko has only played ONE season at age 18. Wayyyy too early to declare the pick as not looking too great. If he's like this in like his 4th/5th season, then yeah, it likely wasn't a great pick.