You are, Go through the thread, read it. He is not on the 4th line. And mixing up the misleading term "4th line minutes" and player assignments is the mistake you make. You are also replying to my post in which I explicitly explain what the problem is with playing on the 4th line is - low skill linemates. This is not what is going on with Pordkolzin on SKA. And for the hundredth time playing 8 minutes is not going to hurt his development per se. If people want to believe that minutes equal development - fine, then 10 hours straight of pond hockey with kids would develop a monster of an NHLer.
One thing is certain, if a teenager is yet not deeemed ready to play 15+ minutes in the KHL he is not getting more in the NHL and any other league is worse than the KHL Podkolzin is playing in.
Thanks for your (kind) response. I don't need to be bogged down by your back and forth with others and all the baggage that comes with it. And I certainly won't read 100 of your posts to hear you pontificate and defend being in an argument that you created all on your own.
My question was not in any way unfair, and it was a legit inquiry.
I intentionally used the term 4th line minutes, rather than 4th line player. For me, the reason for that language sits in the question: how does his team see him: As a developing top level player, a player they don't yet trust in many situations, or as a player that deserves to only play 6-9 minutes a game? So I was asking you, is he a 4th line player and does the team see him as a 4th line player.
It seems clear to me that the team feels he is less ready right now than the 3-6 wingers playing ahead of him. And that might be a fair assessment. I was and am keen to know if it is also your assessment?
Or something else is going on.
If he is only being given 4th line minutes because he hasn't earned more, than this is completely reasonable usage and it will be up to him if he earns more. And if he legitimately hasn't earned those minutes with his performance, then I would agree he likely would not earn them in Vancouver either.
However, if his team is mis-using him for a variety of other reasons, including him leaving or not signing, him being on a certain contract, then this would be a bad situation for the player and for his development.
I choose to believe that he is a young player that needs to develop and earn trust to be used up the lineup and that he has a bright future ahead of him in time.
I most certainly didn't say that minutes is correlated perfectly to development, but are you seriously trying to argue that there is not at least some correlation between more minutes and development, especially at the level he is playing at? For example, would he be more likely to develop playing first line minutes (let's say 19 minutes a night) in the KHL than 4th line minutes (Say an average of 7 minutes)? Of course he would. Would 2o minutes a night for 4 months in the AHL or MHL be better than 2:30 a night at the KHL level? This is a more complex question.
But, I couldn't help be most struck by you jumping to your pond hockey example. This seems a ridiculous way to have a discussion on this board, IMO.
In the end, sounds like you think he is going to be a good player and just needs some time developing. And I prefer to hear more about that and the answer to my above questions rather than being mocked by you for my question, but to each his own.
Cheers