I think PLD would shit himself to play on the same team as Bergy.
I just dont think the Bruins can compete with the marketplace for PLD nor should they. He's a really good player and would solve a problem for them long term, but he's not a great fit in 2021 and they have very few assets compared to teams like the Rangers where he fits better.
I'd rather they hold their assets for a LHD if one of the kids isn't quite good enough and bide their time to see if they can get center depth in the summer.
I pass on PLD, unless they would accept a package consisting of:I just dont think the Bruins can compete with the marketplace for PLD nor should they. He's a really good player and would solve a problem for them long term, but he's not a great fit in 2021 and they have very few assets compared to teams like the Rangers where he fits better.
I'd rather they hold their assets for a LHD if one of the kids isn't quite good enough and bide their time to see if they can get center depth in the summer.
Maybe a stage that can fit more than Tortorella on it but those are hard to findPierre-Luc Dubois' Desire to Be Traded Stems From Wanting "A Bigger Stage," Per Report
From the words of Elliotte Friedman
That’s a massive package. I’m sure they would take that. I don’t think Sweeney can afford to give away all their nhl ready prospects though.I pass on PLD, unless they would accept a package consisting of:
Beecher, one of Lauzon/Zboril/Vaak, Bjork, first round pick in 2023 and a secondary B prospect.
No way I am trading Stud, with Coyle/Stud and PLD we are set down the middle for a long time.
Not sure if this is enough for CLB.
Ops I read it wrong. I thought you said all three prospects.That’s a massive package. I’m sure they would take that. I don’t think Sweeney can afford to give away all their nhl ready prospects though.
Pierre-Luc Dubois' Desire to Be Traded Stems From Wanting "A Bigger Stage," Per Report
From the words of Elliotte Friedman
Just curious how he's not a great fit for the Bruins in 2021 when they could put him on the LW and now have a legit young center to go forward with?
Because he is a center and you're paying for that and it puts Krejci in a super weird position as well.
That first line would be nastyThat was my basis for it. You fill the loss of DeBrusk with Dubois. He comes in, gives you better all around play + nasty in the top 6 and then you have your #2 center who will take over for Bergeron down the road. Now, you need to eventually replace DeBrusk but it's easier to find a winger than center.
Also, when is Barkov a FA?
Dubois -- Barkov -- Pastrnak
Marchand -- Bergeron -- ???
Yeh, if this ever happened Dubois playing wing not Krejci for this yearBecause he is a center and you're paying for that and it puts Krejci in a super weird position as well.
Who's offering him that as a choice? Renaud Lavoie?Rumors are that PLD 1st choice destination is Mtl.
My biaised Habs friends wouldn’t do a Suzuki for PLD 1 for 1 trade.
Would you?
Rumors are that PLD 1st choice destination is Mtl.
My biaised Habs friends wouldn’t do a Suzuki for PLD 1 for 1 trade.
Would you?
Yeh, if this ever happened Dubois playing wing not Krejci for this year
PLD brings something different than Montreal's current centers. Danault is a very good #3C. Then it comes down to Kotkaniemi or Suzuki. What are their expectations? I really like Suzuki so if I were Montreal, I wouldn't hesitate moving a package surrounding Kotkaniemi. If Columbus still wants to compete this season, Suzuki makes more sense. That said, PLD, Danault, and Kotkaniemi down the middle is a very good center* group especially as Kotkaniemi grows into that #2C role.Rumors are that PLD 1st choice destination is Mtl.
My biaised Habs friends wouldn’t do a Suzuki for PLD 1 for 1 trade.
Would you?