The way Lebrun, Bobby Mac and Dreger keep talking like it doesn't sound like Edmonton is going after a 2/3 line centre, more like a 1-2 line centre.
They keep saying "top" centre, that doesn't strike me as referring to guys like Berglund, Amisinov, etc...
The general consensus out of them is that Perron is not enough to get a top centre in return....Well I think everybody knows that..
I think MacT is targeting 2-3 line centres with a Perron deal and a 1-2 line centre or Dman with a Eberle deal... just a hunch though..
If Edmonton trades Eberle who slots in his place? Does anyone honestly think Yakupov is ready to play top line competition?
I disagree. To me, "top center", especially in the way they're using it, refers to top 6, which would be the classic "scorning line" usage of the term. I think it's only message board regulars and NHL15 type trade proposals that seem to think any trade is minor unless it involves franchise players who consider top to mean the league's elite.
A Perron for Anisimov trade (for example) is actually a pretty big move for both teams, and involve players who are significant pieces, but it's not considered a big deal on HF unless names like Hall or Johansson are involved.
Obviously the Oilers would love to add a 1st line C to their roster, but I would definitely consider any 2C to be worthy of the term "top center". Names like Schenn, Bozak, O'Reilly, Anisimov, Henrique, etc. would all be considered top centers IMO, even though none of them are 1st liners (maybe O'Reilly).