K1984
Registered User
- Feb 7, 2008
- 13,959
- 13,635
Oh good, this incredibly stupid tactic again.
Clear the space to get him on a long term deal.
It's not trolling, The Oilers can't afford to sign him long term unless they move some serious cap and Bouchard might not even want to sign long term because he knows that he's going to get an enormous contract 2-3 years from now after 2-3 years of playing Oilers top PP unit and playing alongside Ekholm, not to mention in a higher cap landscape. In fact, he'd be foolish to take a long term deal now tbh so a bridge seems like the only path at this point.Seravalli out there trying to troll Oilers fans talking about bridging or trading Bouchard. As if we would be clutching guys like Yams, Kulak and Ceci as indispensible and we couldn't ever find cap space for Bouch.
No, get him on his bridge for 2 years, have him massively out perform the cap hit and use the other cap space wisely to shore up the rest of the team.Oh good, this incredibly stupid tactic again.
Clear the space to get him on a long term deal.
Clear which space? To improve as a team, you need to add, not subtract quality depth.Oh good, this incredibly stupid tactic again.
Clear the space to get him on a long term deal.
Even if you deem certain guys overpaid and want them gone, that money is better off being used on guys to help us now.Clear which space? To improve as a team, you need to add, not subtract quality depth.
By the time Bouchard's bridge contract would be up, odds are the cap significantly increases.
Clear which space? To improve as a team, you need to add, not subtract quality depth.
By the time Bouchard's bridge contract would be up, odds are the cap significantly increases.
What's the window? Are we assuming that Draisaitl and McDavid are as good as gone when they are UFA?No, get him on his bridge for 2 years, have him massively out perform the cap hit and use the other cap space wisely to shore up the rest of the team.
It makes SO much sense when you consider the window.
Yeah his 4 points with Tampa since getting traded are too good to pass up.......Tanner Jeannot is who I would go after in the offseason
We all saw this coming. LolOh good, this incredibly stupid tactic again.
Clear the space to get him on a long term deal.
I look at the support cast a lot too.What's the window? Are we assuming that Draisaitl and McDavid are as good as gone when they are UFA?
As those guys age we will have some great young guys coming up. Broberg, Bourgault, Holloway, McLeod. We can continue to add as wellI look at the support cast a lot too.
How long are the support cast going to continue to be as great as they are? RNH, Kane, Hyman, Ekholm, all 30+
Need to capitalize these next few years while there is seemingly a winning formula with a group of guys that work well.
Clear which space? To improve as a team, you need to add, not subtract quality depth.
By the time Bouchard's bridge contract would be up, odds are the cap significantly increases.
We aren't assuming that, but winning is very hard and if you have a way to make that more feasible, you have to take that chance. Getting Bouchard on a deal that he will fully out perform will make the rest of the team better (assuming the cap space is used correctly).What's the window? Are we assuming that Draisaitl and McDavid are as good as gone when they are UFA?
Honest question, is there an appetite for signing Lucic at $1M this off-season to play a 4th line role?
Friedman's 32 thoughts blog suggests that Woodcroft's trust in Desharnais nixed a deadline deal. Have to think that we probably saved our 2nd not trading for Radko Gudas.
He also mentions Evan Vierling, who I'll take a closer look at in Barrie's next series. Maybe a potential C prospect who might make up for not signing Brind'amour.
Absolutely not. Kostin is a better player, can skate and isn't a dickhead in the room. That guy can sign a retirement deal in Calgary or Vancouver.I'd sign Lucic for league min
Absolutely not. Kostin is a better player, can skate and isn't a dickhead in the room. That guy can sign a retirement deal in Calgary or Vancouver.
To me that doesn't mean making decisions for the short term unless they are the deadline type deals. If it is a core player, you save money in the long run by avoiding the bridge deals.We aren't assuming that, but winning is very hard and if you have a way to make that more feasible, you have to take that chance. Getting Bouchard on a deal that he will fully out perform will make the rest of the team better (assuming the cap space is used correctly).
I would not pay for Dumba unless he comes at a discount, how much of will it cost to up grade on Ceci.How much of an upgrade on ceci are Severson or Dumba really going to be?
These guys are probably going to be looking for longer term deals in the 5+ range. I’m not sure if they’re going to be enough of an upgrade to warrant spending the extra money on.
Ceci’s contract is terrific value for what he brings and we’re not tied to him into his mid/late 30’s