Tyrolean
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2004
- 9,625
- 724
That's dumb. Unproven goalie and Chia gives overly generous terms. That GM really screwed the organization.modified ntc, 15 team no trade list
That's dumb. Unproven goalie and Chia gives overly generous terms. That GM really screwed the organization.modified ntc, 15 team no trade list
A #5 AHL defensemenMaybe we can trade him for a #5 defenceman like we did with the last one we had.
Also would be really satisfying if he did work out because God damn I hate the ducks and I’m sick of getting scored on 6 on 5 with these ridiculously lucky breaks they constantly get against us. I just really feel owed by them.Sprong dominates the AHL at least.
In Ho-Sangs last 2 AHL season he had 16 goals. People say Benson might not be good cause he didn't score much last year. He had 15.
That's dumb. Unproven goalie and Chia gives overly generous terms. That GM really screwed the organization.
Grabner really found a way to stay relevant first as a break away specialist, then as a PK specialist, and then in his later years molded that into a more comprehensive package. If Grabner didn't have those special traits he brought to the table he would of found his way out of this league and would probably be playing in Europe right now. Unless Ho-Sang can put up the points immediately he's going to have to find a niche that he can fill to buy himself more time, a lot of high skill junior players who can't find a niche and don't provide 2nd line level offense often end up flaming out like your Rattie's, Petan's, and Schremp's of the world.
Everyone has the chance to claim Ho-Tsang every year. This isn’t the first time he’s been on waivers. Two big problems with Ho-Tsang
-Screams off ice nightmare
-Can’t score goals at the pro level
pass
I’d look at Sprong but I wouldn’t touch Ho-Tsang
Sprong dominates the AHL at least.
In Ho-Sangs last 2 AHL season he had 16 goals. People say Benson might not be good cause he didn't score much last year. He had 15.
Interesting. Thanks for that. Well atleast I won’t have to wait long to know if I should be excited or pissed off about HoSangs future.
Everyone has the chance to claim Ho-Tsang every year. This isn’t the first time he’s been on waivers.
If by rumour you mean fact, then yes it was a rumour.
I always thought so too, but it’s not really that bad actually. The 3 guys drafted have played like 1300 games, and scored 600 points. And that’s with Plante being a complete bust. If you take the guys taken 2 spots after us, we end up with Hamill, Cherepanov, and Blum. That’s 130 games, and 28 points. Or it could have been say Ellerby, Esposito, and White.
It certainly could have been better if we got the best player at every pick, but Plante was the only real miss there, and 4 of the 5 guys taken after him were also busts. That draft turned into a bust because Nash bailed and we went from 2 out of 3 to 1 out of 3.
I’ll look for article JUST FOR YOU. Are we not on a rumour site?
And Ho-Sang hasn't even really been a good playmaker at the AHL level either though. Guy is a bust.Benson and Ho-Sang are playmakers. Since when was GOALS the be all, end all of an offensive player? Production has always been about POINTS. Goals that wouldn't have happened if not for a great assist exist quiet frequently. I mean it's nice that McDavid upped his goal scoring ability, but if he had won his first Art Ross with 100 assists he'd still be looked upon as one the game's best. ......Or has Toronto's Austin Matthews is the greatest cause 1 goal = 2 assists narrative really took hold and brainwashed even Oiler fans....
I would put a claim on Ho-Sang & Sprong while putting Grandlund & Sheahan on waivers. I really doubt any team will be active in trying to claim those players. Is being at 50 contracts really that bad?
Jurco-McDavid-Ho-Sang
Nygard-Draisaitl-Sprong
Chiasson-RNH-Neal
Kharia-Haas-Kassian
Ex: Russell, Archibald