tabs
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2009
- 827
- 489
I’d assume he starts on the third line and if he plays well will get a shot next to McD. I can’t see them starting him there.Give JP top six time
I’d assume he starts on the third line and if he plays well will get a shot next to McD. I can’t see them starting him there.Give JP top six time
Really? I just saw 6 months and I subscribed yesterday.Subscribed haha had to do a little clicking around but sounds like the deal is for a year.
Umm a really good third liner. Had 12 points in 30 games in rookie year. Had 9 goals 10 assists last yearwtf is a Bjork
That would be a pretty big step up for us. Would Carolina do it just for the cap savings? We’d be adding over 3 mill but if he can play next to McD that would be a great deal for us.Carolina.
They got Neiderreider on the 4th line.
I could see them moving Dzingel or Foegele.Carolina.
They got Neiderreider on the 4th line.
Sounds like per Stauffer, Puljuarvi signs with Oilers then they trade Chiasson to Boston for Bjork.
Puljujarvi (1.25M) + Bjork (1.60) = Chiasson (2.15)
2.85 M - 2.15 M = +700k
Bjork-X-Puljujarvi
Umm a really good third liner. Had 12 points in 30 games in rookie year. Had 9 goals 10 assists last year
Foegele is young, cheap, and outscored Nino last year. Dzingel scored about the same for 2 mill cheaper. If they’re actually playing Nino on the fourth line, there might be something there.I could see them moving Dzingel or Foegele.
Woodguy55 was on Lowetide's show. Had some interesting things to say.
Larsson, Bozak and Koivu were the three guys he thinks we should target as 3C
Also mentioned that there was nothing he could find that would make him think we should touch Murray as a goalie option.
What I liked about him is he used stats and some actual logic when talking about the various players.
That seems like a lopsided swap to me, but I haven't paid much attention to Bjork lately.
I’d definitely be interested in NinoFoegele is young, cheap, and outscored Nino last year. Dzingel scores about the same for 2 mill cheaper. If they’re actually playing Nino on the fourth line, there might be something there.
If Hall goes to Colorado, they have 2 years window before they are in cap hell. Their window isn't as big as people think. The Oilers are looking like a better spot for him overall longterm
I think everyone would. It’s more about why Boston would do that deal.I'll take Bjork over Chiasson. More speedy, younger and does has untapped offence
It's just a rumour and I believe they will because they have lots of LWersWhy is Boston moving Bjork for Chiasson? Do you have an explanation?
I don’t understand all the Koivu speculation, I’m fairly certain he asked not to be traded at the deadline and it was widely reported that if Min didn’t re-sign him he would go back to Finland and play then retire.I would take Koivu for a year, but I have no idea what he has left. Team needs more vets.
Subscribed haha had to do a little clicking around but sounds like the deal is for a year.
I think he'd be a decent add.I would take Koivu for a year, but I have no idea what he has left. Team needs more vets.
That would be a pretty big step up for us. Would Carolina do it just for the cap savings? We’d be adding over 3 mill but if he can play next to McD that would be a great deal for us.
I don’t understand all the Koivu speculation, I’m fairly certain he asked not to be traded at the deadline and it was widely reported that if Min didn’t re-sign him he would go back to Finland and play then retire.
I’ve never heard anything from anyone credible that he’s even considering signing somewhere else in UFA
I'll take Bjork over Chiasson. More speedy, younger and does has untapped offence
Yeah, I meant lopsided for us. Bjork was seen as a potential second line guy not too long ago.
Bob doesn't usually throw stuff out like that for nothingThis is my thinking. Chiasson for Bjork would be a solid move. There must be more to it, or, it is all baloney.