Ok. Let's actually take a look at the numbers instead of simply taking your word for it. Bottom six lineups as of game one of round two of the playoffs.
Tampa bottom six (points, CF%, xGF%):
Nick Paul - 14 in 21, 49.77%, 50.72%
Pierre-Edouard Bellemare - 20 in 80, 48.57%, 53.99%
Brandon Hagel - 7 in 22, 53.61%, 52.55%
Corey Perry - 40 in 82, 50.85%, 56.30%
Ross Colton - 39 in 79, 51.87%, 54.10%
Pat Maroon - 27 in 80, 51.25%, 54.16%
Colorado bottom six (points, CF%, xGF%):
JT Compher - 33 in 70, 48.41%, 48.51%
Nicolas Aube-Kubel - 22 in 67, 49.57%, 50.17%
Darren Helm - 15 in 68, 49.50%, 46.28%
Nico Sturm - 3 in 21, 50.66%, 50.45%
Andrew Cogliano - 1 in 19, 49.64%, 50.43%
Andre Burakovsky - 61 in 80, 55.07%, 51.92%
Tampa total of 147 points in 364 games for a .40 ppg. Average CF% of 50.99%, average xGF% of 53.63.
Colorado total of 135 pints in 325 games for a .42 ppg (better than Tampa, lol). Average CF% of 50.48%, average xGF% of 49.62%.
Colorado actually has a better bottom six when it comes to ppg than the group Tampa is trotting out, albeit marginally so. Tampa is better in generating shots slightly and certainly generates the better quality shots. The fancy stats show the Lightning are better in possession; actual production on the ice shows Colorado is just as good.
I intentionally left off Newhook since he hasn't played in the playoffs to this point, but if you include him (and drop Cogliano for shits and giggles) Colorado's numbers go to 167 in 377 for a .44 ppg and an average CF% of 50.32% and an average xGF% of 49.41%...
The Avs can go toe-to-toe with Tampa's bottom six firepower and with Newhook sitting Bednar is actually playing a slightly better possession group. The Avs are slightly better with Cogliano in over LOC too.