Jetfaninflorida
Southernmost Jet Fan
If the problems are easily addressable...wouldn't they have been addressed at some point over the past half season?
I know I sound hopelessly pessimistic lately, and it's totally true that the Jets can still win this series - I hope they do. But I find it hard to avoid responding to comments like the above when they seem so full of logical holes. This team has been objectively pretty bad for half a season (and there is evidence that it wasn't all that good the first half either). What is there that would lead anyone to think issues that were evident in game #1 - and which have been pretty evident for some time now - are somehow "easily addressable"? From the outside it seems like they maybe should be easy to address...but so far they haven't been so who knows?
Nothing is easy with Maurice. So many things could have happened but didn't, leading to new lines going into game 83. Go figure.
But my post above, I was referring specifically right now to The Blues series. Look at Game 1. If we add the net front presence to our offensive game (tons of traffic in front of and around Binni + pucks to the net) and play fast and physical with tight gaps like periods one and two, we win. That's it IMHO.
We fail badly when we try to go into a defensive shell when leading. Our gaps widen, d men back way into our end giving up the zone, leading to all kinds of havoc and offensive zone time for our opponent. Eventually, the puck finds the back of our net.
We can be more conservative when we have a lead, with less O Zone pinching by D men for example and the centerman staying a bit higher in their zone, but still maintain our gaps and physicality. Don't completely abandon the game plan that got us the lead in the first place, and adopt the game plan that caused us to lose 10 games this year when leading after 2.