doublechili
For all intensive purposes, your nuts
- Apr 11, 2006
- 18,627
- 14,998
How about, "Roster rumors speculation trade talk 2022-23 Pt XIV: The Cone of Silence"Getting close to have to change the thread topic again
How about, "Roster rumors speculation trade talk 2022-23 Pt XIV: The Cone of Silence"Getting close to have to change the thread topic again
This is true. Had Lee came in at an unsustainable 22% he would have had 36 which would have been right on Brock's tail, but ultimately fallen short.He wasn’t last season.
Its easy to look good in a system that requires you to play little or no defense. You forget the Isles gave up a huge amount of goals:The Islanders are one of the least dynamic teams in the league and people want us to trade Barzal? Jeez...
Let's see what he can do under Lambert first. If his play doesn't elevate itself then we might we talking in a year, but anyone who remembers him playing under the gung-ho style of Weight knows what he is capable of.
As unlikely as it is - the closer free agency gets Forsberg testing the market is more hopeful.
Forsberg should be plan A.
It possibly means Isles don’t move 13 OA and draft a good young prospect.
As for the D - Hague would be my main target with another D signed at Free agency - maybe Leddy again at a reasonable cost.
So Lee is a known commodity and that gives him a free pass to under achieve? Barzal puts up more points than Lee for the same cap hit. You call out Barzal but are ok with Lee? And don’t give me any of that leadership crap. We didn’t see any of that help last years team. You are just being a hypocrite and have something against Barzal.So, now we are back to Trotz and his system are to blame, yet the TEAM had success under Trotz?
Lee, 31, is a known commodity and his salary is what it is. No one is projecting 'ifs, buts, what ifs' etc. on Lee, like Barzal and his 'potential.'
As much as people say Isles need scoring up front a lack of play makers is a real issue. Isles have very few forwards that I would consider consistent play makers.That's a reminder that Beau fit in really, really well on RW with Lee/Nelson. If we manage to send Bailey's contract away and then also trade Beau, who provides the playmaking on RW for Lee and Nelson? I don't think we're ready to pencil Holmstrom in on the 2nd line just yet, and I don't see anyone else in the organization who would fill that need.
I've no dog in the fight re criticism of Barzal. (I want to keep him, but instead of forcing to be a Trotzian style center, either play a way that suits his game, or move him to the wing).So Lee is a known commodity and that gives him a free pass to under achieve? Barzal puts up more points than Lee for the same cap hit. You call out Barzal but are ok with Lee? And don’t give me any of that leadership crap. We didn’t see any of that help last years team. You are just being a hypocrite and have something against Barzal.
No, but that's because he'll be a 35+ contract, and I worry about his durability at this point. As a player, he'd be an ideal C to pair with a a Barzal winger. That combo could be scary scary good.To those who don’t feel Barzal is a true 1C, would you go after Malkin if he hits free agency?
Very true what you say about Lee. I don’t have anything against Lee or Barzal. Both are flawed players. I’m just puzzled by people who criticize Barzal and think Lee is not a problem.I've no dog in the fight re criticism of Barzal. (I want to keep him, but instead of forcing to be a Trotzian style center, either play a way that suits his game, or move him to the wing).
In defense of Lee, I think it is an incredible success that he played as well as he did the year coming back from a knee injury. It's very common for athletes to perform worse the year after an injury even if there is a full restoration of strength + range of motion. People might call the reason 'psychological'. I don't necessarily disagree *however* I don't distinguish psychological & physical in the way others do. Still, scoring 28 goals after major knee surgery is a wild success, and I'd call out anyone calling that out.
Going to be frustrating when NYR find a way solidify their center ice position while only costing one of their underperforming lottery balls (Kakko +).
Going to be frustrating when NYR find a way solidify their center ice position while only costing one of their underperforming lottery balls (Kakko +).
This is exactly my point. And since I don't expect Barzal to accept a pay cut I would be willing to hear offers for Barzal now and not wait until he hits free agency.The jury is still out on him, IMHO. He can't carry a team, this much is clear (and won't change); I wonder what he could do with true top-line skill on his wing. The clock is ticking on him; truthfully, if he doesn't improve his production this next season that should earn him a pay cut.
Yes, since the likelihood that Johnny G even becomes a free-agent is slim to none, Filip is the ideal target for the many reasons we all know, particularly being able to keep most of our limited assets, which may even include our 13OA.All on board for this and probably should be the way to go. Would have to move 2 of Bailey/Beau/Varly to make this work but I wouldn't be opposed to picks and prospects for Bailey and Beau to improve the farm. Could sign someone like Mikheyev to fill in the middle 6
Forsberg-Barzal-Wally
Lee-Nelson-Palms
Parise-JPG-Mikheyev
MM-CC-CC
Bellows/RJ
Anders Lee is hitting right where he should be. Lou paid him $1M/yr more than he should have. I consider it a reward for Lee's willingness to work with Lou in his UFA year to help the Islanders fit Artemi Panarin in under the salary cap. I'm pretty sure Lee was willing to take less money from the Islanders to do this, when it was likely the Canadiens were offering $7M/yr to Lee.So Lee is a known commodity and that gives him a free pass to under achieve? Barzal puts up more points than Lee for the same cap hit. You call out Barzal but are ok with Lee? And don’t give me any of that leadership crap. We didn’t see any of that help last years team. You are just being a hypocrite and have something against Barzal.
No. Malkin's got physical issues. Likely to miss significant time every year.To those who don’t feel Barzal is a true 1C, would you go after Malkin if he hits free agency?
Malkin is aging, old, and his brain is getting progressively worse. I would rather get Kadri, make Barzal a winger and have Nelson play 1C until thenTo those who don’t feel Barzal is a true 1C, would you go after Malkin if he hits free agency?
To those who don’t feel Barzal is a true 1C, would you go after Malkin if he hits free agency?
do you want talent or do you want another Leo Komarov?Someone is backing up the Brink truck to sign Kadri, based on his playoff heroics and more importantly his "out of norm" 28-59-87 (which translates to a 100pts because he only played in 71 games) season, when the dude has never come close to that production in his career.
He was a per-82 of 21-30-51 (about half of what he did last season) the previous three years.
Let someone else pay 8 million+ for multiple years for the 32-year old....
For the millionth time, it doesn't need to be us.....
Is it that you wouldnt want Fiala, or because it would cost too much to acquire?Neither.
Someone is backing up the Brink truck to sign Kadri, based on his playoff heroics and more importantly his "out of norm" 28-59-87 (which translates to a 100pts because he only played in 71 games) season, when the dude has never come close to that production in his career.
He was a per-82 of 21-30-51 (about half of what he did last season) the previous three years.
Let someone else pay 8 million+ for multiple years for the 32-year old....
For the millionth time, it doesn't need to be us.....
Talent of course.do you want talent or do you want another Leo Komarov?