I don’t think you understand the situation, whatever bullying went on — it’s not like there is any bets to hedge. You would have to be brain dead to think that it was called for. That is what it is.
But right now there is something else that is going on, and that is a — mega big — news story that is not good for anyone, at all.
There is no direct link between one g/f of a hockey player acting like a psychopath and it becoming a mega big news story. This news story is not good for any individual, it is not good at all for Ottawa Senators, it is not good for the NHL and it’s not good for hockey, it is in fact a PR nightmare.
This is the mess we have ended up with, and in this context you have someone who have acted like a psychopath but that alone should not have been enough to create this extreme mess. And it’s an extreme mess, its like headline news on CNN sports international, could like be the biggest ‘hockey story’ in a decade...
If you think this is about victim blaming you are just not grasping the situation.
Lucic and the 10th for Spooner?
I'd be thrilled with all the picks 1st and 2nd round outside of maybe Groulx. I personally can't really say anything about him but I wouldn't want another Gropp pick
If he’s as good at blocking trades as he is at blocking shots, we’ve got a chance.Wouldn't Staal block the trade?
I believe Lucic also has a NTC that kicks in within the next couple seasons, meaning he would take up an expansion protection slot.
Let’s turn this into something bigger.......
Lucic 1/2 retained by Edmonton and #10 and next years first for Spooner and Smith
This makes no sense for Edmonton
I don't know how smart it would be to operate under the assumption that there will be another set of buy-outs after the next lock outThere will probably be another round of compliance buy-outs after the next lockout. Will Seattle have their team before then or after?
I don't know how smart it would be to operate under the assumption that there will be another set of buy-outs after the next lock out
Sure, but I doubt they'd know at this point, so why start taking on giant contracts now? And who knows, there might not be another lockout because Bettman probably won't want to ruin what would be Seattle's first season with one after the season Vegas just hadI think teams will have a pretty good idea if there will or won't be
Sure, but I doubt they'd know at this point, so why start taking on giant contracts now? And who knows, there might not be another lockout because Bettman probably won't want to ruin what would be Seattle's first season with one after the season Vegas just had
There's so many factors. Each team lost 2 decent players in a few years. You can argue the franchise fee is enough but maybe buyouts are something to appease teams.Sure, but I doubt they'd know at this point, so why start taking on giant contracts now? And who knows, there might not be another lockout because Bettman probably won't want to ruin what would be Seattle's first season with one after the season Vegas just had
Swap Kaut out for someone else and that is pretty much my dream draft
Kaut at 26 is a steal!.
Why don't u like him?
There's so many factors. Each team lost 2 decent players in a few years. You can argue the franchise fee is enough but maybe buyouts are something to appease teams.
Sorta kinda ... but at least it's becoming more vocal.We knew this already didn't we?