Speculation: Roster Building Thread LXXXV: Sell some now, buy some later

Status
Not open for further replies.

UnSandvich

Registered User
Sep 7, 2017
5,187
7,341
So here’s another question:

assuming you could trade either Strome or Buch and you could keep one of the other only for about $5.5m per season for 4-5 years, which do you choose? Before the season, I’d probably lean Buch but Strine’s versatility is extremely useful

Trade Strome all day every day
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernmeister

UnSandvich

Registered User
Sep 7, 2017
5,187
7,341
I think I would agree with this but it’s become a more difficult decision for sure

After Buchnevich's play this season, and Kakko's lack of results thus far (his underlying numbers notwithstanding) & Kravtsov coming in as a rookie, Buchnevich is not expendable right now.

On the other hand, I think Chytil is showing he's ready to fill the spot we're leaving when Strome is traded
 
  • Like
Reactions: DutchShamrock

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
12,448
8,285
I think it almost has to be right? Lafreniere and Panarin aren’t going there. That line would have the puck all the time.

See this is what I wish I saw more from Quinn and his staff. The thought to project forward how things SHOULD work. Something like:

Panarin-Strome-Gauthier
Lafreniere-Zibanejad-Buch
Kreider-Chytil-Kakko
Lemieux-Rooney-Howden

to me, if this team stick together into next year, that’s the general map I’d like to see just based on how they could be used and how I think the team could be successful.

Gauthier or Lafreniere are not ready for these roles but this is quite possible as soon as next season (plus find a spot for Kravtsov who could play either wing)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glen Sathers Cigar

I Eat Crow

Fear The Mullet
Jul 9, 2007
19,643
12,716
Would the Rangers have interest in Barrett Hayton?




NHL Trade Deadline Big Board: Taylor Hall, Mattias Ekholm and 28 others who could be dealt

Alexis Lafrenière and Hayton were teammates on the 2020 Canadian WJC team. They had some chemistry in the tournament.

John Chayka selected Hayton higher than he was projected because Arizona wanted a center. He is exempt from the expansion draft.
The weird thing with Hayton is that it's so difficult to get a sense of what his value is. Does Arizona want a (lower) 1st this year or next from a contender? Or would they negotiate on a lower prospect and pick like a Howden/Hajek plus a 2nd or 3rd rounder?

I wouldn't trade a 1st for him but I think he can garner more than Howden or Hajek and a pick.

Lundkvist is untouchable in my book. Schneider and Robertson are close to it in my book. The farm is too thin up front to trade a forward prospect. That leaves trading someone like Zach Jones. I'd do Jones and a mid/low pick or a warm body for Hayton.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Galvatron

Leetch3

Registered User
Jul 14, 2009
12,951
10,727
So here’s another question:

assuming you could trade either Strome or Buch and you could keep one of the other only for about $5.5m per season for 4-5 years, which do you choose? Before the season, I’d probably lean Buch but Strine’s versatility is extremely useful

i think strome is hugely under-appreciated here...but given the choice, i'm picking buch. chytil is ready to be 2C, not as clear on the young wingers....but either way you need to make sure there is no NMC/NTC clause so you have the option to move them in year 3+ of the deal if the kids emerge and we need the cap flexibility...

but I think the first domino in the cap situation is what we are going to do with 1C...how much cap space we allocate to that position will likely dictate our options for the rest of the lineup....
 

leetch99

Leetch66 Joined 2007
Oct 5, 2017
3,604
3,365
PEI Canada
Just had a quick look at Hayton's games played.....I doubt a club would trade a top 5 pick after 34 NHL games . I think that is a dead end ....unless they have an abundance of C depth and or need a top 4 Dman like Lundkvist who might reach that level in the NHL.....and might not not either . Worth a phone call for sure especially if they want to part ways .
 

jay from jersey

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
5,928
4,139
i think strome is hugely under-appreciated here...but given the choice, i'm picking buch. chytil is ready to be 2C, not as clear on the young wingers....but either way you need to make sure there is no NMC/NTC clause so you have the option to move them in year 3+ of the deal if the kids emerge and we need the cap flexibility...

but I think the first domino in the cap situation is what we are going to do with 1C...how much cap space we allocate to that position will likely dictate our options for the rest of the lineup....
I think your right on both counts to an extent. I think many don’t give strome enough credit, he’s basically turned around his career here. However, with the steps Chytil has taken this season, I’d love to see him with an increased role next year. More minutes, PP,etc. basically strome s role now. I think if Fil has another good offseason and practices his face offs he could be a 2nd line monster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leetch3

Leetch3

Registered User
Jul 14, 2009
12,951
10,727
Just had a quick look at Hayton's games played.....I doubt a club would trade a top 5 pick after 34 NHL games . I think that is a dead end ....unless they have an abundance of C depth and or need a top 4 Dman like Lundkvist who might reach that level in the NHL.....and might not not either . Worth a phone call for sure especially if they want to part ways .

yeah my interest is based on the idea that they have soured on him for whatever reason and its a buy low option...not looking to offer enough to pry him away since he hasn't had success as a pro. in a buy low option i'm willing to gamble thats because he was rushed to the pros cause he's only 20. but definitely not trading nils for him.
 

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
12,448
8,285
So here’s another question:

assuming you could trade either Strome or Buch and you could keep one of the other only for about $5.5m per season for 4-5 years, which do you choose? Before the season, I’d probably lean Buch but Strine’s versatility is extremely useful

My heart says keep Buch, my brain says it should be Strome.
 

duhmetreE

Blessed Bigly
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2012
33,826
50,833
Just had a quick look at Hayton's games played.....I doubt a club would trade a top 5 pick after 34 NHL games . I think that is a dead end ....unless they have an abundance of C depth and or need a top 4 Dman like Lundkvist who might reach that level in the NHL.....and might not not either . Worth a phone call for sure especially if they want to part ways .
From what I gathered, Arizona's top priority is shedding salary

Dvorak is due $5M next season. We can take that off their hands. :naughty:

I'd imagine they really want to move OEL.. can't really see any takers in this market. Kessel as well.
 

HatTrick Swayze

Just Be Nice
Jun 16, 2006
16,920
9,912
Chicago
For Hayton I'd consider moving our 1st this year assuming no lottery win. ~10th overall pick in a weak draft.

Maybe I am overrating the Hayton I remember from the WJCs. Don't presume to have seen him a lick this year. But if he can be a Brassard-like add at 20 years old I'd move the pick.
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
41,736
51,945
In High Altitoad
The weird thing with Hayton is that it's so difficult to get a sense of what his value is. Does Arizona want a (lower) 1st this year or next from a contender? Or would they negotiate on a lower prospect and pick like a Howden/Hajek plus a 2nd or 3rd rounder?

I wouldn't trade a 1st for him but I think he can garner more than Howden or Hajek and a pick.

Lundkvist is untouchable in my book. Schneider and Robertson are close to it in my book. The farm is too thin up front to trade a forward prospect. That leaves trading someone like Zach Jones. I'd do Jones and a mid/low pick or a warm body for Hayton.

Hayton has a better chance of being that multi purpose middle six center than anyone else we have so I'd certainly take a shot.

Howden+Jones. If Nils is being traded, it has to be for more of a sure thing.
 

jay from jersey

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
5,928
4,139
From what I gathered, Arizona's top priority is shedding salary

Dvorak is due $5M next season. We can take that off their hands. :naughty:

I'd imagine they really want to move OEL.. can't really see any takers in this market. Kessel as well.
OEL will only waive for Boston so he’s out. Dvorak could be a target. I’m not as high on him as many others are though.
 

duhmetreE

Blessed Bigly
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2012
33,826
50,833
OEL will only waive for Boston so he’s out. Dvorak could be a target. I’m not as high on him as many others are though.
Dvorak fits the bill. We don't need world beaters at center. Solid 2way middle 6 centers fit our need IMO. He's much better than Strome and Chytil right now defensively. That's the main difference... and he has a nice contract/good value
 
  • Like
Reactions: HatTrick Swayze

DutchShamrock

Registered User
Nov 22, 2005
8,104
3,060
New Jersey
So here’s another question:

assuming you could trade either Strome or Buch and you could keep one of the other only for about $5.5m per season for 4-5 years, which do you choose? Before the season, I’d probably lean Buch but Strine’s versatility is extremely useful
I keep Buch, which isn't a knock on Strome.

I think we need a more diverse center group. Too similar between Mika, Strome and Chytil. I would like to get a defensive, match up specialist in the 3rd line.
 

Oscar Lindberg

Registered User
Dec 14, 2015
15,643
14,464
CA
We dodged a bullet not giving Strome a long term deal last summer

My appetite to give him an extension past what he’s got now is in the negatives
 

Sayba

Dark Schneider
Jul 7, 2009
2,345
2,291
After Buchnevich's play this season, and Kakko's lack of results thus far (his underlying numbers notwithstanding) & Kravtsov coming in as a rookie, Buchnevich is not expendable right now.

On the other hand, I think Chytil is showing he's ready to fill the spot we're leaving when Strome is traded

What do you suggest we do with Kakko and Kravtsov?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Metz vs Lille
    Metz vs Lille
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $354.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $340.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Bologna vs Udinese
    Bologna vs Udinese
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $365.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Clermont Foot vs Reims
    Clermont Foot vs Reims
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $15.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Lorient vs Toulouse
    Lorient vs Toulouse
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $310.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad