While people mention Price, I don't think anyone's mad that Price isn't a Jay. What people are mad about is that we didn't make an offer of any kind (like say 28 million over 7 years) and give him the opportunity to either back his words about liking it here or leave.
The reason this is troublesome is because we've had a long history of not being able to sign free agents at market value and refusing to even make an offer to Price is going to hurt our future chances.
We could have fit 28 million in without too much trouble (no Happ and trade Dickey would pretty much cover it), but Shapiro values paying fair value for average players and hoping to get lucky then to pay fair value for top end players.
We had a management team like that before. It was the JP Ricciardi era and it sucked. We've now brought in a GM who is supposedly good at development, but you could argue that our farm is better than theirs despite being gutted twice in the last 5 years.
Just from reading your posts it's pretty obvious you're short sighted, and generally don't have a clue what you're talking about.
1. The Jays farm is nowhere near Boston's after last year. It may not be the most reputable baseball source, but Bleacher Report had Toronto's system ranked #26
after the trade deadline, and Boston at #2. Besides Pompey, all other relevant pieces are in the low minors, and are far from being relevant MLB pieces. Boston has several pieces in AAA that could be ready as early as next year - similar to Pompey, in addition to a stocked lower minor system.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...-mlb-farm-systems-post-trade-deadline/page/30
2. It was never only about fitting 28-31m in for Price in 2016. That's being short sighted. Its was doable - at the cost of leaving some pretty big gaps in the #3-5 spots in the rotation as well as throughout the bullpen - bigger gaps than what people are *****ing about now.
No, it's the term that would be crippling in future years (years 6, 7 of the contract, and maybe 5). The same reason why everyone here yammering on about how bad this contract will be in 3-4 years (personally I think Price will be solid for 5+ years before regressing) is why Toronto balked at offering him a contract. The Jays simply aren't in the market to hand out ~200M+ contracts and eat 1-3 years of the
highest paid pitcher in his declining, mid-30s years.
They had too many holes to plug between the rotation and bullpen for it to make sense to use over 22% of that 140M budget on a guy who plays every 5 days. I'm not sure why that's so hard for people to digest. The rotation would have been Price/Stroman and then fallen off a massive cliff with something like Hutch / Sanchez / Osuna or Hutch / Sanchez / Chavez - crippling the bullpen and pushing the payroll to the 140M budget. There would be no room to add to the BP.
When you look at the rotation from last year, all the Jays need to do to be so much better off, is protect against parading out a bunch of unproven MLB starters and/or AAA scrubs like Norris, Copeland, Doubront, Redmond, Boyd and Sanchez and hoping something sticks. Those 6 guys combined for 26 starts - 6 short of what a regular starters 32 starts. If you can maintain a rotation of proven starters like Stroman / Dickey / Estrada / Happ / Chavez and avoid the unproven AAA arms you're a thousand times better off. On top of that the Jays look to be replacing the 28 starts from the guy who pitched his way out of the rotation (Hutchison), who looks to be depth this year. It's a good bet to assume one starter will get hurt / need some time off, so Hutch will probably see some starts, but I doubt 28 of them.
It was never about "paying fair value for average players and hoping to get lucky then to pay fair value for top end players". It was about fielding a rotation of 5 capable, proven starters, as opposed fielding Stroman / Hutch and then gambling and hoping to get lucky on arms like Hutch / Sanchez / Osuna / etc as starters.
3. This seems very personal to you. you used the phrase
"give him the opportunity to either back his words about liking it here or leave", after proposing a contract that's 21 million dollars cheaper than what he got in Boston. Here's something to think about -- just because he liked it here doesn't mean he HAS to stay. You act like he owed Toronto something. You act like nobody would say they "like it here" while they are in the middle of a race to win the division, and the front runner to win it. You act like you wanted Toronto to offer Price 28x7, knowing he was going to get something bigger, knowing he might turn it down so you could call him a phoney for leaving Toronto. You're just mad because Toronto didn't give a lesser offer and the chance to say no - which says something about you.
Boston will be competing for a division championship next year. 21M is a lot to leave on the table, especially from a team that is willing to break the luxury tax, and in general has been a ton more successful than Toronto recently - they aren't a team that's can be held down for long.