It’s a f***ing Jaeckel piece. “Sources”.Yeah, it’s a negotiation, but 5M x 4 years is a slap in the face.
Legit a little annoyed I unknowingly gave Jaeckel a click.
Legit a little annoyed I unknowingly gave Jaeckel a click.
i mean teams should be more careful when giving him a contract i dont really know how that can be argued. it sucks but its the reality of the situation. pardoning him for substance abuse and mental illness was def not how that should have been written tho.
Wow.i mean teams should be more careful when giving him a contract i dont really know how that can be argued. it sucks but its the reality of the situation. pardoning him for substance abuse and mental illness was def not how that should have been written tho.
I don’t get it either, and I have a lot of the same mental health issues as lehner.what do you mean wow?
Offer him $7m for 6 years. There are only three goalies making more than that currently per season (Lundqvist, Bob, and Price), and there are real arguments to be had that those three aren't/weren't worth their current deals.
4 yrs @ 8.5 per.I would rather do 8.0 or 8.5 over 5 years.
6 years is to long a term IMO, I really I would want 4 but would be okay with 5
4 yrs @ 8.5 per.
4 yrs @ 8.5 per.
If this is his cost I walk away.
4-5 years 6 million AAV.
1 major point in all this, who of the Bhawks goalie prospects is ready to step in and be the teams #1 starting goalie ??
good point, for a goalie of Lehner talent, what would the going price be ??Or other free agents. Just because we don't have a prospect ready does not mean we need to overpay for another goalie.
btw on a second thought, i wish i remember the site, but there was talk of the quality of the goalie this off-season and on a whole they not being worth the going money.Or other free agents. Just because we don't have a prospect ready does not mean we need to overpay for another goalie.