Have any proof of that? Watching them would prove otherwise. Maybe Seguin is more powerful but rarely do we see it. RNH is much more willing to go into the tough areas of the ice.
I don't know when Seguin suddenly turned into a powerforward but it's starting to by a little out of hand. Things are being exaggerated. Last year when Seguin was being compared Hall he was an undersized perimeter player. Then people see him without a shirt and now he's Getzlaf.
Seguin is to power forward what Komisarek is to puck-moving defenseman.
.... I think what you might be hearing (through the odd lens that his HFB) is that Seguin's performance in the "dirty areas" of the ice improved over the season, and got much better (in my eyes) in the postseason. He started to look like the two-way talent he was initially billed as. He's got about the same build as I saw in the beginning of 2010-11 (which is to say, ripped but not necessarily stout) and could stand to add a bit of muscular girth.
He's still a perimeter/off-the-rush player, but I could see him getting to the front and working the boards with much more success and panache this year than in 2010-11. I think a 25g, 50+ point sophomore campaign is not out of the question, but 20+, 40+ would be a good step in the right direction, and is quite likely, in my estimation....
Anywho, on topic, I'd much rather have Seguin (and though that's a homer opinion, at my most objective, it's how I feel)... who I see as having 40g potential. RNH has a lot more physical work to do (in my estimation) and will be w/o question the better playmaker... but I'd rather build a team around a more solid (physically), 2-way sniper/playmaker than a youngster with a lot of weight to gain and a much more PP-dependant production... time may prove me wrong, but that's where I sit now