A different way to look at it would be that Nylander was 100% responsible for the goal he caused, whereas he was only partially responsible for goals scored.
The fact that his line was also impotent on the power play could be mentioned.
A different way to look at it would be that Nylander was 100% responsible for the goal he caused, whereas he was only partially responsible for goals scored.
The fact that his line was also impotent on the power play could be mentioned.
I remember many Leafs fans weren't thrilled with his anti-Nylander stance, but these days Nylander seems to be a popular target for criticism.
I think maybe some of us were so excited to have a player with Nylander's potential in the system after years of not having very many good or legit prospects that we were willing to overlook possible flaws - I mean, the guy did drop in his draft year.
I still think he is and will be a more valuable asset than Nick Ritchie. I expect him to bounce back and at least be a 60+ point winger, which is a good asset to have, especially if you can draft him eighth in a draft. But at this point, the question of whether or not you can win with this player as an important piece is worth trying to answer. I do think that if Nylander bounces back and then progresses as a player, at the very least he should be similar to Kessel in that you'll be able to win with him if you have good enough players around him.
Of course, I'm not saying Don is some sort of a genius or that he always makes great calls or tells it like it is. His boy Andersen ****ed up pretty royally in game seven and I doubt he calls him out on that. I also don't recall ever hearing this guy criticize David ****ing Clarkson.
Sure, if you don't like the way Nylander played thats fine. But pretending he was bad, or the reason we lost, or worse than anyone named Matthews is a joke.
I don't think I'm gonna be able to make it through the summer, but know he's not getting traded. Might as well just accept it at this point.
He was a total non-factor this series.
Neither good, nor bad.
Except for the goal he scored and the goal he basically put in our own net, he was completely unnoticeable.
But that's not what you pay $7 million a year for now is it?
He was a total non-factor this series.
Neither good, nor bad.
Except for the goal he scored and the goal he basically put in our own net, he was completely unnoticeable.
But that's not what you pay $7 million a year for now is it?
Okay now this is just as stupid.
How can the guy that lead both teams forwards in 5v5 P/60 be a "total non-factor".
And he did that while being attached to our two worst forwards for 5 games lol.
Just wait until all the 2000+ kids start to enter the workforce.
I dread it.
“Tonight”? LolWas gutless tonight
Grapes is almost always spot on
You'll have plenty of time to complain about it online once your job gets automated.
I just hope I get a participation ribbon.
Just who exactly do you think has been giving these kids their "participation ribbons"?
People who never learned the benefit of losing.
So baby boomers and Gen Ex?
Cherry is an old, senile racist (towards Russians especially)
A different way to look at it would be that Nylander was 100% responsible for the goal he caused, whereas he was only partially responsible for goals scored.
The fact that his line was also impotent on the power play could be mentioned.
They, Russians still make it illgeal to be gay might even kill you for being gay pretty sure at least Cherry at leasts hates with equality.Cherry is an old, senile racist (towards Russians especially) that embodies the old boys club that festers throughout NHL. Outside of the actual game strategies everything he says should be taken with a grain of salt.
4 quaters equal 1 whole.A different way to look at it would be that Nylander was 100% responsible for the goal he caused, whereas he was only partially responsible for goals scored.
The fact that his line was also impotent on the power play could be mentioned.
But I suppose you want me to say the parents of those kids. The previous generation making the next one worse.
Cherry is an old, senile racist (towards Russians especially) that embodies the old boys club that festers throughout NHL. Outside of the actual game strategies everything he says should be taken with a grain of salt.
Okay now this is just as stupid.