Shesterkybomb
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2016
- 15,757
- 16,612
the reason Messiers leadership was so important to the '94 team was because Keenan was a clown. he completely lost that team.
Being a dominant center didn't hurt either.
the reason Messiers leadership was so important to the '94 team was because Keenan was a clown. he completely lost that team.
Larry and the fans coached last night and we lost.... can we go back to leaning on our top players and winning now?
This might not be popular, but without Panarin the team maybe plays with more urgency, tightening up their game, playing more straight line. He's an elite player, but im beginning to think that he is a vortex that sucks the top guys into believing they all can play that style, and it's not one that is conducive to long term successSeriously without Panarin we probably lose 3-0 yesterday. The offense on this team leaves a ton to be desired
This might not be popular, but without Panarin the team maybe plays with more urgency, tightening up their game, playing more straight line. He's an elite player, but im beginning to think that he is a vortex that sucks the top guys into believing they all can play that style, and it's not one that is conducive to long term success
Are you saying we lost because God forbid our kid line got more than 8 minutes?
They've both been ass basically all season, especially at 5v5 which is a problem since they used to be our best play-driving line.plus Mika and kreider kinda looked like ass to me so not sure what would have been much different
Are you saying we lost because God forbid our kid line got more than 8 minutes?
you can clearly see Miller trying to get out of the way and crossing the front. It goes by his ear toughest save to make you’re in between as a goalie.
Larry and the fans coached last night and we lost.... can we go back to leaning on our top players and winning now?
Right, so I'd rather just get a good coach than seek out an idea of a captain that doesn't really exist anymore.the reason Messiers leadership was so important to the '94 team was because Keenan was a clown. he completely lost that team. you dont need a Messier if the coach isn't a clown. our coach is a clown.
Pinning the loss on the goalie after we were outplayed most of the game is the most Ranger thing ever
I totally see what you’re saying but Panarin even when only slightly on his game makes everyone around him much better.
I truly think without him we better be giving up 2 goals or less every game. There is just no one even close to him when it comes to bringing offensive consistency/production
Yeah but the vets have excelled under Quinn according to the QuinntupletsThey've both been ass basically all season, especially at 5v5 which is a problem since they used to be our best play-driving line.
Pinning the loss on the goalie after we were outplayed most of the game is the most Ranger thing ever
Again, this is why we have charts. People just make things up and repeat them until they're accepted as truth.
Zibanejad played 20:28; season average - 20:24
Fox played 28:07; season average - 24:42
Lafreniere played 12:01; season average - 13:42
Kakko played 14:01; season average - 14:57
That's at all strengths. The vets played more and the kids played less last night than they have most of the season. We literally have multiple posters just making shit up because that's what they think they saw. This is why the "nerds" don't care about your eye test. You're bold-faced wrong and just dying on the hill.
Right, so I'd rather just get a good coach than seek out an idea of a captain that doesn't really exist anymore.
Seriously without Panarin we probably lose 3-0 yesterday. The offense on this team leaves a ton to be desired
They've both been ass basically all season, especially at 5v5 which is a problem since they used to be our best play-driving line.
I don't care what you're talking about. I don't care how you spin it.What are you talking about??? im talking about situational ice time mainly pp2 starting a crucial pp and Laf playing in ot and you're going on about nerd charts and minutes and dying on some imaginary hill. If you don't have a clue don't say anything, nobody will know the difference.
Lmfaooo I’m using that from now onYeah but the vets have excelled under Quinn according to the Quinntuplets
Quinn would have needed to call a timeout if pp1 was to go out at the start of that pp. Also, wtf is up with the composition of our pp2. I think he has two defenders on that unit because he's used to throwing them out there at the last 10 seconds of the pp so they're at least caught out there with two defenders. That unit has no quarterback.What are you talking about??? im talking about situational ice time mainly pp2 starting a crucial pp and Laf playing in ot and you're going on about nerd charts and minutes and dying on some imaginary hill. If you don't have a clue don't say anything, nobody will know the difference.
Just counted really quickly but we are averaging a goal a game more with him in the lineup than without him (when he was out from 2/20-3/13). That is pretty significant. I'm not saying we don't have the firepower because we do but this year it just seems more inconsistent and feel with this lineup we should be doing more.Not really. The offense on this team is pretty good overall when you look at the entire season. They just aren't going to score 4 goals every game. Panarin missed 12 games this year and they are still 10th in goals scored.
No more like you were an annoying asshole last game and being annoying about legitimate complaints because “they won”. Well now they lost to the 8 win team they barley beat Thursday, still happy?
When I say "other coach" am I talking about the other coach we had two weeks ago or the other coach we had like four years ago?
You can get this one, I believe in you!
It's a short sample, but when your AHL coach sees the team perform significantly better than they do under the NHL coach, and revert almost immediately when the NHL coach comes back, it should probably raise some red flags.I'm touched by your faith.
It has to be about AV because I know you don't believe you have enough data to evaluate Knoblauch.
If that is wrong, wow!
It's a short sample, but when your AHL coach sees the team perform significantly better than they do under the NHL coach, and revert almost immediately when the NHL coach comes back, it should probably raise some red flags.