i don't share your urgency or certainty re Rydahl situation
NYR gonna have man-games missed due to injury, and all are gonna be needed
fact is, Rydahl has had multiple stretches of missed AHL games when dinged up,
yet he was the guy they recalled to Montreal when a potential need arose
not convinced that your 'entire point' actually reflects Rangers view
not trying to change your, or anyone's mind, NONE OF US actually know
There's nothing urgent about it. The evidence is in front of you.
If the Rangers have Rhydal pegged as a 13th or 14th forward and/or 5th C option they:
A.) Likely wouldn't have claimed a forward for the exact same role as he would have
B.) Wouldn't have played that claimed forward in front of him if he were a "depth" acquisition
Rhydal is further down the depth chart than some around here think he is (like saying he can more or less take Goodrow's place) and the Ranger's actions seem to bear that out.
Sure, he was recalled when there were Chytil was a question mark and Brodzinski's wife went into labor but the it was either him or Carpenter and it speaks volumes that the Rangers felt the need to claim yet another option.
But, yes, you're right that none of us know and this is MY opinion.
Further strengthening my point: