DJ Spinoza
Registered User
- Aug 7, 2003
- 25,348
- 3,874
I think Kingham could be ok as a long reliever, and in the medium and long-term that might be how he makes a living for himself. But I guess I just defer to him as a starter because we know that Lyles can be an effective bullpen option. Here's how the bullpen looks to me right now:
Vazquez, Kela, Crick, RichRod – obvious locks, late-innings
Burdi, Liriano – likely locks, due to Rule 5 + lack of depth/experience
That makes 6, so room for at least 1-2 more. A normal bullpen would just be 1, so it could be Lyles/Kingham, with the other being the long man. Kingham could be more suited for that, but I think Lyles gives you the best weapon, and maybe you give Lyles or Burdi the occasional multi-inning stints. There's no true long reliever in the event that something unforseen happens, but Liriano has tons of experience, and worst case, we have to tap into AAA in order to rest a few guys.
If you figure that the top-4 in the rotation will give you a lot of length, then I think it's an easy gamble to see what Kingham can do as the #5 starter, allowing Lyles to potentially usurp him if he really falters over 3 starts or something. Sure, in that case there'd also be some transition time to Lyles getting more stretched out, but Brault will be available and stretched out as an emergency arm, and Brubaker could also get a spot start/brief long-man duties, etc.
Just from a roster construction perspective, I like this the most. I'm really high on Burdi, and so as long as Crick gets back to normal, you might have 6 guys who are really plus arms in the bullpen. That would make not having a designated long reliever less of an issue except in the event of a weird rain delay or extra innings, which are the kinds of things you generally have to respond to on the fly anyways.
Vazquez, Kela, Crick, RichRod – obvious locks, late-innings
Burdi, Liriano – likely locks, due to Rule 5 + lack of depth/experience
That makes 6, so room for at least 1-2 more. A normal bullpen would just be 1, so it could be Lyles/Kingham, with the other being the long man. Kingham could be more suited for that, but I think Lyles gives you the best weapon, and maybe you give Lyles or Burdi the occasional multi-inning stints. There's no true long reliever in the event that something unforseen happens, but Liriano has tons of experience, and worst case, we have to tap into AAA in order to rest a few guys.
If you figure that the top-4 in the rotation will give you a lot of length, then I think it's an easy gamble to see what Kingham can do as the #5 starter, allowing Lyles to potentially usurp him if he really falters over 3 starts or something. Sure, in that case there'd also be some transition time to Lyles getting more stretched out, but Brault will be available and stretched out as an emergency arm, and Brubaker could also get a spot start/brief long-man duties, etc.
Just from a roster construction perspective, I like this the most. I'm really high on Burdi, and so as long as Crick gets back to normal, you might have 6 guys who are really plus arms in the bullpen. That would make not having a designated long reliever less of an issue except in the event of a weird rain delay or extra innings, which are the kinds of things you generally have to respond to on the fly anyways.