Oh wow, that hurt...Or you.... just saying...
Coming from a blind homer that defends Mbappe’s huge flop...
Oh wow, that hurt...Or you.... just saying...
I said it before, I'll say it again. Those new/modern soccer balls are a ***** to catch.
If you hit them just right they act like balloons changing directions in a split second. Completely unpredictable. It looked bad but if you look close you see how Muslera went one direction and then the ball just blew straight in the other direction as if deflected.
Wasn't much he could do yet he looks like an ass and commentators and fans around the world are laughing at him. Feel bad for this guy.
Calm down. Easy win for France. That s all that matter. Don't you think?You mean when english players DOVE without being TOUCHED. (and laughed at Colombian players being called for foul).
See the difference? Hopefully?
First of all, that contact was laughable. Far as I'm concerned that's either an Mbappe dive or an embellishment at a level where the distinction is irrelevant.You mean when english players DOVE without being TOUCHED. (and laughed at Colombian players being called for foul).
See the difference? Hopefully?
I'm saying you can't card someone for being on the ground after a foul. And certainly not as much as the guy who ACTUALLY fouled.Are you saying you can't embellish to waste time after an actual foul?
See above post.Calm down. Easy win for France. That s all that matter. Don't you think?
The two angles I've seen don't suggest the ball moved much.
Tripper only? Not only did he dive, but he also laughed at the opponent for being called for a foul.Second, Colombia was every bit as dirty as Uruguay. I realize whining about England is nearly sport for some people, but have the slightest bit of perspective. And the only guy that dove without contact was Trippier. You were off it all match.
Yeah. It was more like this.unlike karius he didnt get hit before.
You can totally card someone for such a massive obvious flop. The only argument you have is that the refs should do it more often. It’s getting out of hand with all this embellishment.I'm saying o
you can't card someone for being on the ground after a foul. And certainly not as much as the guy who ACTUALLY fouled.
It's amazing all those new HF football fans, or rather soccer, who have zero understanding of how a ref should crack down on fouling rather than embellishing and who can't see the difference between a dive and an embellishment.
They always play with sandpaper. It's in their footy philosophy.Argentina,Brazil,Colombia,Paraguay,Uruguay it's crazy hiw these countries becomes dirty when result isn't in their favour
Or people just don't agree with you. Rather than claiming lack of understanding, you might want to consider that.I'm saying o
you can't card someone for being on the ground after a foul. And certainly not as much as the guy who ACTUALLY fouled.
It's amazing all those new HF football fans, or rather soccer, who have zero understanding of how a ref should crack down on fouling rather than embellishing and who can't see the difference between a dive and an embellishment.
I understand, but why don't you just enjoy to advance.See above post.
It's crazy to think people put embellishments at the level of actual fouling. It's been that way all WC too.
Hehe, I do !I understand, but why don't you just enjoy to advance.
The way Uruguay is playing it might as well be. That second goal came at the worst possible time for them.Hehe, I do !
Game's not over though.
Yeah. It was more like this.
I'm not mixing anything. I pretty well covered it in that bit that you snipped.Tripper only? Not only did he dive, but he also laughed at the opponent for being called for a foul.
And Maguire? He also dove in the box without ever being touched.
So again, you're mixing diving without contact and rolling on the ground after contact.